Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;15(4):264-71.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017707.

Improving comfort and communication in the ICU: a practical new tool for palliative care performance measurement and feedback

J E Nelson  1 , C M Mulkerin, L L Adams, P J Pronovost
Affiliations

Improving comfort and communication in the ICU: a practical new tool for palliative care performance measurement and feedback

J E Nelson et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a practical set of measures for routine monitoring, performance feedback, and improvement in the quality of palliative care in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Design: Use of an interdisciplinary iterative process to create a prototype "bundle" of indicators within previously established domains of ICU palliative care quality; operationalization of indicators as specified measures; and pilot implementation to evaluate feasibility and baseline ICU performance.

Setting: The national Transformation of the Intensive Care Unit program developed in the United States by VHA Inc.

Patients: Critically ill patients in ICUs for 1, > 3, and > 5 days.

Measurements and main results: Palliative care processes including identification of patient preferences and decision making surrogates, communication between clinicians and patients/families, social and spiritual support, and pain assessment and management, as documented in medical records. Application is triggered by specified lengths of ICU stay. Pilot testing in 19 ICUs (review of > 100 patients' records) documented feasibility, while revealing opportunities for quality improvement in clinician-patient/family communication and other key components of ICU palliative care.

Conclusions: The new bundle of measures is a prototype for routine measurement of the quality of palliative care in the ICU. Further investigation is needed to confirm associations between measured processes and outcomes of importance to patients and families, as well as other aspects of validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care: executive summary. J Palliat Med 20047611–627. - PubMed
    1. Center to Advance Palliative Care www.capc.org (accessed April 2006)
    1. Nelson J E, Meier D E. Palliative care in the intensive care unit, Part I. J Intensive Care Med 199914130–139.
    1. Carlet J, Thijs L G, Antonelli M.et al Challenges in end‐of‐life care in the ICU/Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 200430770–784. - PubMed
    1. Truog R D, Cist A F, Brackett S E.et al Recommendations for end‐of‐life care in the intensive care unit: the Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2001292332–2348. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms