Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;72(8):5428-35.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02906-05.

Molecular fingerprinting of Cryptosporidium oocysts isolated during water monitoring

Affiliations

Molecular fingerprinting of Cryptosporidium oocysts isolated during water monitoring

Rosely A B Nichols et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

We developed and validated a PCR-based method for identifying Cryptosporidium species and/or genotypes present on oocyst-positive microscope slides. The method involves removing coverslips and oocysts from previously examined slides followed by DNA extraction. We tested four loci, the 18S rRNA gene (N18SDIAG and N18SXIAO), the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP) gene (STN-COWP), and the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) gene (by multiplex allele-specific PCR), for amplifying DNA from low densities of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts experimentally seeded onto microscope slides. The N18SDIAG locus performed consistently better than the other three tested. Purified oocysts from humans infected with C. felis, C. hominis, and C. parvum and commercially purchased C. muris were used to determine the sensitivities of three loci (N18SDIAG, STN-COWP, and N18SXIAO) to detect low oocyst densities. The N18SDIAG primers provided the greatest number of positive results, followed by the N18SXIAO primers and then the STN-COWP primers. Some oocyst-positive slides failed to generate a PCR product at any of the loci tested, but the limit of sensitivity is not entirely based on oocyst number. Sixteen of 33 environmental water monitoring Cryptosporidium slides tested (oocyst numbers ranging from 1 to 130) contained mixed Cryptosporidium species. The species/genotypes most commonly found were C. muris or C. andersoni, C. hominis or C. parvum, and C. meleagridis or Cryptosporidium sp. cervine, ferret, and mouse genotypes. Oocysts on one slide contained Cryptosporidium muskrat genotype II DNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bukhari, Z., and H. V. Smith. 1995. Effect of three concentration methods on viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts recovered from bovine feces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2592-2595. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cacciò, S., E. Pinter, R. Fantini, I. Mezzaroma, and E. Pozio. 2002. Human infection with Cryptosporidium felis: case report and literature review. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:85-86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cacciò, S. M., R. C. A. Thompson, J. McLauchlin, and H. V. Smith. 2005. Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends Parasitol. 21:430-437. - PubMed
    1. Fayer, R., M. Santin, M. Trout, and E. Greiner. 2006. Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1-2-year-old dairy cattle in the eastern United States. Vet. Parasitol. 135:105-112. - PubMed
    1. Fayer, R., M. Santin, and L. Xiao. 2005. Cryptosporidium bovis n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus). J. Parasitol. 91:624-629. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources