Preinduction cervical assessment
- PMID: 16885663
- DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00016
Preinduction cervical assessment
Abstract
The rate of labor induction is increasing in the United States. Methods for quantifying cervical factors have been developed to identify patients who may benefit from cervical ripening before induction. The first cervical scoring systems used digital examination. More recently, cervical ultrasound and testing for the presence of fetal fibronectin have been suggested to evaluate cervical readiness for labor induction, but neither of these methods provides a significant improvement over digital examination. The Bishop score, the most widely used digital examination scoring system, still is the most cost effective and accurate method of evaluating the cervix before labor induction.
Similar articles
-
Preinduction cervical assessment.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;43(3):440-6. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200009000-00004. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000. PMID: 10949748 Review.
-
Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):573-84. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00017. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16885664 Review.
-
Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;38(2):198-204. doi: 10.1002/uog.9020. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21484904 Clinical Trial.
-
Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Jan;100(1):52-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Oct 24. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. PMID: 17920604
-
Comparison of elastosonography and digital examination of cervix for consistency to predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labor with oxytocin.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Dec;30(23):2795-2799. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1263296. Epub 2016 Dec 1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017. PMID: 27868465 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Factors Associated with Intrapartum Cesarean Section in Women Submitted to Labor Induction.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Jun;41(6):363-370. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688966. Epub 2019 Jun 27. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 31247664 Free PMC article.
-
A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Nov 12;7:889-99. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S62372. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 26648758 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent advances in the induction of labor.F1000Res. 2019 Oct 30;8:F1000 Faculty Rev-1829. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17587.1. eCollection 2019. F1000Res. 2019. PMID: 31723412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):805-811. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21383643 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Transvaginal Ultrasound Measurements of Cervical Length to Bishop Score in Predicting Cesarean Section Following Induction of Labor: A Prospective Observational Study.Cureus. 2024 Feb 16;16(2):e54335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54335. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38500903 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources