Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jul;94(3):253-62.

Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries

Karen M Albert  1
Affiliations
Review

Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries

Karen M Albert. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The paper reviews and analyzes the evolution of the open access (OA) publishing movement and its impact on the traditional scholarly publishing model.

Procedures: A literature survey and analysis of definitions of OA, problems with the current publishing model, historical developments, funding agency responses, stakeholder viewpoints, and implications for scientific libraries and publishing are performed.

Findings: The Internet's transformation of information access has fueled interest in reshaping what many see as a dysfunctional, high-cost system of scholarly publishing. For years, librarians alone advocated for change, until relatively recently when interest in OA and related initiatives spread to the scientific community, governmental groups, funding agencies, publishers, and the general public.

Conclusions: Most stakeholders acknowledge that change in the publishing landscape is inevitable, but heated debate continues over what form this transformation will take. The most frequently discussed remedies for the troubled current system are the "green" road (self-archiving articles published in non-OA journals) and the "gold" road (publishing in OA journals). Both movements will likely intensify, with a multiplicity of models and initiatives coexisting for some time.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Association of Research Libraries. Framing the issue: open access. [Web document]. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, Office of Scholarly Communication, 2004. [cited 16 Dec 2004]. <http://www.arl.org/scomm/open_access/framing.html>.
    1. Suber P. Praising progress, preserving precision. SPARC Open Access Newsl. [serial online]. 2004 Sep 2(77). [cited 19 Jun 2005]. <http://www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-04.htm>.
    1. McKiernan G. Open access and retrieval: liberating the scholarly literature. In: Fowler DC, ed. E-serials collection management: transitions, trends, and technicalities. New York, NY: Haworth Information Press, 2004:197–220.
    1. Harnad S, Brody T, Vallieres F, Carr L, Hitchcock S, Gingras Y, Oppenheim C, Stamerjohanns H, and Hilf ER. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Ser Rev. 2004 30(4):310–4.(Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W63-4DS8FN9-F/2/8604ea015...>. [cited 19 Apr 2006].).
    1. Kyrillidou M. Journal costs: current trends & future scenarios for 2020. ARL Bimonthly Rep 2000 Jun;210. (Available from: <http://www.arl.org/newsltr/210/costs.html>. [cited 19 Apr 2006].).

LinkOut - more resources