Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug;135(2):269-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.11.051.

Acoustic parameters of snoring sound to assess the effectiveness of sleep nasendoscopy in predicting surgical outcome

Affiliations

Acoustic parameters of snoring sound to assess the effectiveness of sleep nasendoscopy in predicting surgical outcome

Terry M Jones et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of two grading systems used to predict surgical outcome in nonapneic snorers.

Study design: A prospective observational study. Prior to undergoing palatal surgery, 20 patients completed a sleep nasendoscopic examination involving sequential steady-state sedation with intravenous propofol. Using a combination of acoustic parameters of snoring sound as an objective outcome measurement, and the answers to a specifically designed questionnaire as a subjective outcome measurement, the effectiveness of each grading system in predicting surgical outcome was examined.

Results: Depending on the outcome measurement used, sensitivity in predicting success of surgery for snoring varied from 16.7% to 50.0% and specificity from 38.5% to 62.5% for the Pringle and Croft system, while sensitivity varied from 91.7% to 100% and specificity from 30.8% to 31.5% for the Camilleri system.

Conclusion: Sleep nasendoscopy using these classifications cannot be recommended as a reliable predictor of surgical outcome in nonapneic snorers.

Ebm rating: C-4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types