Is systematic scalene node biopsy in pretreatment evaluation of locally advanced cervical carcinoma necessary? Systematic dissection and histopathology of left scalene node biopsies in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma

Abstract

Objective: Cervical carcinomas mainly spread via lymphatics, stepwise from pelvic to aortic and scalenic lymph nodes. Metastatic nodes are the major prognostic factor in this disease. When scalenic nodes are involved, cervical cancer is considered to be disseminated. Since there is a major discrepancy in reported percentages of metastatic scalene nodes in the literature (0 to 50%), we proceeded to systematic pretreatment scalene node biopsy and then evaluated the validity of this procedure.

Methods: From January 1998 to May 2003, 72 patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma and no suspicious paraaortic or scalenic nodes (respectively on magnetic resonance imaging and clinically) had a systematic surgical pretreatment lymph node evaluation (retroperitoneal laparoscopic infrarenal paraaortic lymph node dissection and left scalenic lymph node biopsy). Scalene biopsy was examined using hematoxylin/eosin stain and immunohistochemistry (KL1 antibodies).

Results: Among the 72 patients, 20 were stage IB2, 4 were IIA, 14 were IIB, 4 were IIIA, 27 were IIIB, 1 was IVA and 2 had a recurrent cervical carcinoma. Fourteen women had histologically confirmed paraaortic metastases (11 macroscopic, 3 microscopic). No metastatic involvement of the scalene nodes was detected. Fifteen patients developed a recurrence within 12 months (3 to 19 months). None of the patients developed scalenic recurrence.

Conclusion: Left scalene node biopsy does not appear to be mandatory in routine pretherapeutic lymph node evaluation of patients with advanced cervical carcinoma and no clinical suspicious nodes. It may be useful to prove disseminated disease in patients with suspicious clinical nodes or hot spots on PET-scan, if fine needle biopsy is unconclusive.