Statistical evaluation of diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis
- PMID: 1689107
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90839-y
Statistical evaluation of diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis
Abstract
Bacterial vaginosis is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of reproductive age. In an attempt to clarify diagnosis of this condition, various parameters of signs and symptoms and groups of parameters were compared with classical diagnostic criteria in 310 patients. There was no significant difference in positive diagnosis rates between the Amsel et al. criteria and those of Thomason et al. (p = 0.25). The single most reliable indicator of bacterial vaginosis was the presence of clue cells on wet mount examination of vaginal secretions (sensitivity 98.2%, specificity 94.3%, positive predictive value 89.9%, negative predictive value 99.0%). The best two combinations of parameters for rapid accurate clinical diagnosis were clue cells and odor on alkalinization (sensitivity 99.5%) positive predictive value 98.8%, negative predictive value 92.1%). Gram stain criteria (bacterial morphologic types) were less accurate predictors of the disease (sensitivity 97.0%, specificity 66.2%, positive value 57.2%, negative predictive value 97.9%). Even when the bacterial morphologic type criteria were combined with presence of clue cells, predictive accuracy did not exceed that of clue cells on wet mount examination alone (sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 84.7%, positive predictive value 74.2%, negative predictive value 96.8%). Homogeneous discharge was found to be of little diagnostic value.
Similar articles
-
Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):573-6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00233-5. Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8841221
-
Detection of bacterial vaginosis in Papanicolaou smears.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jan;160(1):132-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90104-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989. PMID: 2912076
-
Comparison of methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women.J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1266-71. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1266-1271.1989. J Clin Microbiol. 1989. PMID: 2473992 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginitis/vaginosis.Clin Lab Med. 1989 Sep;9(3):525-33. Clin Lab Med. 1989. PMID: 2676321 Review.
-
Evaluation of vaginal complaints.JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1368-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1368. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15026404 Review.
Cited by
-
Six years observation after successful treatment of bacterial vaginosis.Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1997;5(4):297-302. doi: 10.1155/S1064744997000513. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 18476155 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of vaginal acetic acid in patients undergoing treatment for bacterial vaginosis.J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Nov;42(11):5170-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5170-5175.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15528711 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial vaginosis.Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Dec;82 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv16-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.023119. Sex Transm Infect. 2006. PMID: 17151045 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Vaginal symptoms of unknown aetiology: a study in Dutch general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jun;43(371):239-44. Br J Gen Pract. 1993. PMID: 8373647 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a point-of-care test, BVBlue, and clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Mar;43(3):1304-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1304-1308.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 15750100 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical