Possible ancestral structure in human populations
- PMID: 16895447
- PMCID: PMC1523253
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020105
Possible ancestral structure in human populations
Abstract
Determining the evolutionary relationships between fossil hominid groups such as Neanderthals and modern humans has been a question of enduring interest in human evolutionary genetics. Here we present a new method for addressing whether archaic human groups contributed to the modern gene pool (called ancient admixture), using the patterns of variation in contemporary human populations. Our method improves on previous work by explicitly accounting for recent population history before performing the analyses. Using sequence data from the Environmental Genome Project, we find strong evidence for ancient admixture in both a European and a West African population (p approximately 10(-7)), with contributions to the modern gene pool of at least 5%. While Neanderthals form an obvious archaic source population candidate in Europe, there is not yet a clear source population candidate in West Africa.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures




References
-
- McBrearty S, Brooks AS. The revolution that wasn't: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. J Hum Evolution. 2000;39:453–563. - PubMed
-
- Wolpoff MH. Paleoanthropology. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1999. 878. p.
-
- Wolpoff MH, Wu X, Thorne AG. Modern Homo sapiens origins: A general theory of hominid evolution involving the fossil evidence from East Asia. In: In Smith FH, Spencer F, editors. The origins of modern humans: A world survey of the fossil evidence. New York: Liss; 1984. pp. 411–483.
-
- Stringer CB, Andrews P. Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern Humans. Science. 1988;239:1263–1268. - PubMed