[The hemodynamic effects of various hydroxyethyl starch solutions in heart surgery patients]

Abstract

Blood conservation is gaining more and more interest because of the increasing risks involved in homologous blood transfusions. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is becoming an established technique even in cardiac surgery patients. The "optimal" kind of volume replacement, however, is still controversial. Thus, this study was carried out to investigate the hemodynamic response of 6 different hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions as volume replacement. METHODS. In 60 patients undergoing elective aortocoronary bypass surgery, acute, preoperative hemodilution was performed (10 ml/kg) and HES with different concentrations, molecular weight, and substitution was infused according to a randomized sequence: 1. 6% HES 450,000/0.7; 2. 10% HES 200,000/0.5; 3. 3% HES 200,000/0.5%; 4. 6% HES 40,000/0.5; 5. 6% HES 200,000/0.5; 6. 6% HES 200,000/0.62. All patients were monitored using a new pulmonary artery catheter that allows measurement of the right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), right ventricular enddiastolic volume (RVEDV), and right ventricular end systolic volume (RVESV) in addition to standard hemodynamic parameters. RESULTS. Immediately after finishing ANH the typical hemodynamic changes of hemodilution (HD) were apparent (decrease in peripheral resistance and increase in cardiac index (CI]. All 6 solutions investigated were effective in hemodynamic stabilization (no changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), filling pressures (PCP, RAP), or heart rate (HR]. Forty min after ANH, however (before beginning extracorporeal circulation (ECC], there were significant differences between the groups: in groups 3 and 4 the increase in CI had already disappeared, and SVI in group 3 was even lower than the baseline values (-8%). In the other groups, a higher CI level remained even 40 min after ANH, which was most pronounced in groups 2 (+40%) and 5 (+43%). Right ventricular performance was not changed by ANH (RVEF unchanged in all groups). Forty min after hemodilution RVEDVI (-8%) and RVESVI (-16%) decreased significantly only in group 4, whereas in the other groups these parameters were still elevated. The most pronounced positive fluid balance after the end of ECC was found in group 4 (+850 ml); in these patients paO2 decreased significantly (-150 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS. The guarantee of stable hemodynamic conditions is a prerequisite when performing ANH in coronary surgery patients. The different physiochemical attributes of various HES solutions seem to be important, thus influencing their hemodynamic response. In this study, low-concentration (3% HES 200/0.5) and low-molecular (6% HES 40/0.5) HES solutions were less effective in stabilizing hemodynamics until the beginning of ECC. Additionally, their negative influence on fluid balance during ECC, followed by a deterioration in pulmonary function led to the conclusion that other solutions are preferable; in particular, 10% HES seems to be of advantage in these situations.