Recalls and safety alerts affecting automated external defibrillators
- PMID: 16896108
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.6.655
Recalls and safety alerts affecting automated external defibrillators
Abstract
Context: Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) play a key role in the community resuscitation of persons with cardiac arrest and are of proven clinical benefit. Although AEDs are complex medical devices designed to function during life-threatening emergencies, little is known about their reliability.
Objectives: To determine the number and rate of AED recalls and safety alerts, to identify trends in these rates, and to identify the types of malfunctions prompting AED and AED accessory advisories.
Design and setting: Analysis of weekly US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Enforcement Reports between January 1996 and December 2005 was performed to identify all recalls and safety alerts (collectively referred to as "advisories") involving AEDs and AED accessories. Confirmed AED device malfunctions were identified by reviewing AED-related adverse events reported to the FDA.
Main outcome measures: Number of AEDs and AED accessories subject to FDA recall or safety alert between January 1996 and December 2005; annual AED advisory rates; and number of confirmed fatal AED-related device malfunctions reported to the FDA.
Results: During 2.78 million AED device-years of observation, 52 advisories (median [25th and 75th percentiles], 4.5 [3.0 and 5.0] per year) affecting 385,922 AEDs and AED accessories were issued. The mean (SE) annual number of AEDs affected by advisories was 5.1 (1.5) devices per 100 AED device-years. Overall, 21.2% of AEDs distributed during the study period were recalled, most often because of electrical or software problems. The AED advisory rate did not significantly increase during the study period, although the annual number of AED advisories (P for trend =.02) and AED advisory devices (P for trend = .01) did increase. Confirmed fatal AED-related device malfunctions occurred in 370 patients.
Conclusions: Automated external defibrillators and AED accessory advisories occur frequently and affect many devices. Actual AED malfunctions do occur occasionally, although the number of observed malfunctions is small compared with the number of lives saved by these important devices. As the prevalence of AEDs continues to increase, the number of devices affected by advisories can also be expected to increase. Efforts should be directed at developing a reliable system to locate and repair potentially defective devices in a timely fashion.
Comment in
-
Automated external defibrillators--device reliability and clinical benefits.JAMA. 2006 Aug 9;296(6):700-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.6.700. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16896114 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Recalls and safety alerts involving pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generators.JAMA. 2001 Aug 15;286(7):793-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.7.793. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11497532
-
Changing trends in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator generator advisories.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Dec;25(12):1670-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01670.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002. PMID: 12520666
-
Pacemaker and ICD generator malfunctions: analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual reports.JAMA. 2006 Apr 26;295(16):1901-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.16.1901. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16639048
-
Ventricular fibrillation, automatic external defibrillators, and the United States Food and Drug Administration: confrontation without comprehension.Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;26(5):621-31; discussion 632-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70015-3. Ann Emerg Med. 1995. PMID: 7486373 Review.
-
Should recent defibrillator and lead advisories affect decisions to refer patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy?Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010 Jan;25(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328333d375. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 19907318 Review.
Cited by
-
Preliminary feasibility assessment of CDM-based active surveillance using current status of medical device data in medical records and OMOP-CDM.Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 15;11(1):24070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03332-6. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34911976 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of a distributed medical device safety surveillance system: the DELTA network study.Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Feb 26. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011. PMID: 21356331 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Safety of Aspiration Thrombectomy Catheters Utilizing Prospective, Active Surveillance of the NCDR CathPCI Registry.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e004666. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004666. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019. PMID: 30764652 Free PMC article.
-
[Inappropriate analyses of automated external defibrillators used during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests].Aten Primaria. 2013 Apr;45(4):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Dec 23. Aten Primaria. 2013. PMID: 23265845 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Public health surveillance and the prevention of injuries in sports: what gets measured gets done.J Athl Train. 2007 Apr-Jun;42(2):171-2. J Athl Train. 2007. PMID: 17710165 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials