Treatment of pressure ulcers: results of a study comparing evidence and practice
- PMID: 16896239
Treatment of pressure ulcers: results of a study comparing evidence and practice
Abstract
Pressure ulcers remain prevalent in hospitals and nursing homes despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines for prevention and care. To evaluate the level of evidence-based literature and its application in pressure ulcer treatment, a search was conducted of relevant English and German articles published between 1994 and 2002 using the key terms decubitus ulcer and its synonyms in different combinations with therapy, wound management, and specific wound treatment terms. Results were compared to wound dressing use data obtained from two pressure ulcer prevalence surveys conducted in 51 hospitals and 15 nursing homes in Germany in 2001 and 2002 (N = 11,584). Dressing usage evidence levels were reviewed and reported usage was classified as consistent or not consistent with existing guidelines or as evidence base unknown. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates ranged from 10.6% to 13.2% and the majority of pressure ulcers (60%) were Grade 1. In nursing homes, dressing selection was consistent with current evidence in 6.8% of Grade 1 and 27.8% of Grade 2 ulcers. In acute care facilities, dressing selection in 2001 and 2002 was consistent with current evidence in 21.6% and 38.5%, respectively, of Grade 1 ulcers and in 40.2% and 51.5%, respectively, of Grade 2 ulcers. Although strong evidence exists to support the use of dressings that facilitate moist wound healing, barely half of the grade 3 and grade 4 ulcers in all care settings received this treatment. While dressing classification limitations restricted the ability to analyze all treatment methods used, findings suggest that clinician knowledge deficits regarding evidence-based treatments remain. The literature review results also indicate the level of evidence for many practice recommendations remains low. Studies to increase evidence levels of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment as well as programs to improve awareness and implementation of current evidence-based guidelines are needed.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based management of chronic wounds.Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007 Nov;20(11):591-600. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000284936.32707.8d. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007. PMID: 17975367 Review.
-
The prevalence, management, equipment provision and outcome for patients with pressure ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district.J Tissue Viability. 2009 Feb;18(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2008.11.001. Epub 2008 Dec 20. J Tissue Viability. 2009. PMID: 19097794
-
Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Jun;49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003. PMID: 12874483
-
Pressure ulcers in neonates and children: an NPUAP white paper.Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007 Apr;20(4):208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000266646.43159.99. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007. PMID: 17415029 Review.
-
Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. A synopsis of the current evidence from research.Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;13(4):547-54. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11778342 Review.
Cited by
-
Pressure ulcers in four Indonesian hospitals: prevalence, patient characteristics, ulcer characteristics, prevention and treatment.Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):184-193. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12580. Epub 2016 Mar 28. Int Wound J. 2017. PMID: 27021798 Free PMC article.
-
Cutaneous wound healing after treatment with plant-derived human recombinant collagen flowable gel.Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Jul;19(13-14):1519-26. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0345. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013. PMID: 23259631 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical