Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002:2:e24.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.49. Epub 2002 Mar 1.

Participation of general practitioners in disease management: experiences from The Netherlands

Affiliations

Participation of general practitioners in disease management: experiences from The Netherlands

L M G Steuten et al. Int J Integr Care. 2002.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the extent to which GPs in The Netherlands participate in disease management and how personal opinions, impeding and promoting incentives as well as physician characteristics influence their attitude towards disease management.

Methods: The attitude-model of Fishbein and Ajzen was used to describe the attitude of GPs towards disease management and main influencing factors. After interviewing seventeen representatives of the GPs and testing a questionnaire, the final questionnaire was sent to all GPs in The Netherlands (7680 GPs) barring those involved in the testing of the questionnaire.

Results: At least 10.4% of all Dutch GPs are active in disease management. The main factors predicting a positive attitude towards disease management are the following: GPs' opinion that they are improving quality and efficiency of care when executing disease management, presence of a good quality network between actors involved prior to the start of disease management, working in a health centre, and performing sideline activities besides their daily activities as GPs. The main factors predicting a negative attitude are: GPs' opinion that the investment-time is too high, lack of reimbursement for disease management activities, working in a solo practice, and not performing any sideline activities beside their daily activities as GP.

Conclusions: The factors predicting a negative attitude of Dutch GPs towards disease management dominate the factors predicting a positive attitude. The arguments in favour of disease management are matters of belief, for example concerning improvements in the quality of care, while arguments against are more concrete barriers e.g. high workload and financial reimbursement. Placed on the innovation timeline, the 10.4% participation might be taken to represent the start of a trend.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Weight factors for the disease management formula.

References

    1. Tuinstra T, Matthesius D, Groothoff JW, Post D. Groningen: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken; 1998. Disease management: een eerste verkenning.
    1. Bodenheimer T. Disease management: promises and pitfalls. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340(15):1202–5. - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Millbank Quarterly. 1996:511–44. - PubMed
    1. Spreeuwenberg C. Managed care en disease management. Medisch Contact. 1999;54(2):56–8.
    1. Zorgverzekeraars Nederland. Zorgverzekeraars en Disease Management. Zeist: Zorgverzekeraars Nederland; 1998.

LinkOut - more resources