Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Sep-Oct;27(5):589-93.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-005-1155-5.

Efficacy of signal-averaged electrocardiography in the young orthotopic heart transplant patient to detect allograft rejection

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Efficacy of signal-averaged electrocardiography in the young orthotopic heart transplant patient to detect allograft rejection

M S Horenstein et al. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard survey for cardiac graft rejection. Signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) identifies slowly conducting, diseased myocardium. We sought to determine whether SAECG is a sensitive, noninvasive transplant surveillance method in the young.Ninety-four SAECGs recorded prior to biopsy in 20 young transplant (OHT) patients and those from 15 healthy age-matched controls (CTL) were analyzed. In the OHT group, 56 no-rejection (NOREJ) (ISHLT grades 0 or 1 A) and 37 acute rejection (REJ) (ISHLT grades IB, 2, and 3A) SAECGs were compared, SAECGs were filtered at 40-255 Hz. Total QRS duration (QRSd), duration of terminal low amplitude of QRS under 40 microV (LAS), and root mean square amplitude of terminal 40 msec of QRS (RMS40) were compared.SAECGs were significantly different in CTL vs NOREJ but not in NOREJ vs REJ: QRSd, 81.7 +/- 8, 107.2 +/- 18.4, and 112.3 +/- 21.6 msec, respectively; LAS, (18 +/- 5.8, 23.6 +/- 10.7, and 27 +/- 14.8 msec, respectively; and RMS40, (169.3 +/- 100.4, 68 +/- 48.8, and 57.5 +/- 45.6 microV, respectively. Children following OHT exhibited significant differences in the SAECG compared to controls. Differences between the NOREJ and REJ groups were negligible. Therefore, SAECG may not be effective in detecting OHT rejection in the young.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002 Oct;14(5):611-9 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Nov;12(11):1712-6 - PubMed
    1. J Electrocardiol. 2000 Jan;33(1):17-22 - PubMed
    1. Transplantation. 2004 Nov 27;78(10):1523-31 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 15;85(4):405-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources