The impact of health plan delivery system organization on clinical quality and patient satisfaction
- PMID: 16899002
- PMCID: PMC1797097
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00529.x
The impact of health plan delivery system organization on clinical quality and patient satisfaction
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which measures of health plan clinical performance and measures of patient perceptions of care are associated with health plan organizational characteristics, including the percentage of care provided based on a group or staff model delivery system, for-profit (tax) status, and affiliation with a national managed care firm.
Data sources: Data describing health plans on region, age of health plan, for-profit status, affiliation with a national managed care firm, percentage of Medicare business, total enrollment, ratio of primary care physicians to specialists, HMO penetration, and form of health care delivery system (e.g., IPA, network, mixed, staff, group) were obtained from InterStudy. Clinical performance measures for women's health screening rates, child and adolescent immunization rates, heart disease screening rates, diabetes screening rates, and smoking cessation were developed from HEDIS data. Measures of patient perceptions of care are obtained from CAHPS survey data submitted as Healthplan Employer Data and Information Set, Consumer Assessment of Health Plans 2.0 H.
Study design: Multivariate regression cross-sectional analysis of 272 health plans was used to evaluate the relationship of health plan characteristics with measures of clinical performance and patient perceptions of care.
Principal findings: The form of delivery system, measured by percent of care delivered by staff and group model systems, is significantly related (p < or = .05) with four of the five clinical performance indices but none of the three satisfaction performance indices. Other variables significantly associated with performance were being geographically located in the Northeast, having nonprofit status, and for patient satisfaction, not being part of a larger insurance company.
Conclusions: These comparative results provide evidence suggesting that the type of delivery system used by health plans is related to many clinical performance measures but is not related to patient perceptions of care. These findings underscore the importance of the form of the delivery system and the need for further inquiry that examines the relationship between organizational form and performance.
Similar articles
-
Managed care and the delivery of primary care to the elderly and the chronically ill.Health Serv Res. 1998 Jun;33(2 Pt Ii):322-53. Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9618674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physician performance assessment: nonequivalence of primary care measures.Med Care. 2003 Sep;41(9):1034-47. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000083745.83803.D6. Med Care. 2003. PMID: 12972843
-
Primary care provider turnover and quality in managed care organizations.Am J Manag Care. 2007 Aug;13(8):465-72. Am J Manag Care. 2007. PMID: 17685827
-
Managed care organizations' performance in delivery of adolescent immunizations, HEDIS, 1999-2002.J Adolesc Health. 2008 Feb;42(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.030. Epub 2007 Dec 26. J Adolesc Health. 2008. PMID: 18207091
-
Measuring integrated care.Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):B4245. Dan Med Bull. 2011. PMID: 21299927 Review.
Cited by
-
Motivating medical information system performance by system quality, service quality, and job satisfaction for evidence-based practice.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 21;12:135. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-135. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012. PMID: 23171394 Free PMC article.
-
Preventive Care Quality of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations: Associations of Organizational Characteristics With Performance.Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):326-35. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000477. Med Care. 2016. PMID: 26759974 Free PMC article.
-
Provider and systems factors in diabetes quality of care.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Feb;14(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0234-x. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012. PMID: 22173711 Review.
-
Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Feb;87(2):151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.009. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012. PMID: 22305027 Free PMC article.
-
Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease - a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 29;8:198. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-198. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 18823556 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baker L C, Hopkins D, Dixon R, Rideout J, Geppert J. Do Health Plans Influence Quality of Care? International Journal of Quality in Health Care. 2004;16(1):19–30. - PubMed
-
- Casalino L P, Devers K, Reed M, Lake T, Stoddard J. Benefits of and Barriers to Large Medical Group Practice. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003b;163(16):1958–64. - PubMed
-
- Casalino L, Gillies R R, Shortell S M, Schmittdiel J A, Bodenheimer T, Robinson J C, Rundall T, Oswald N, Schauffler H, Wang M C. External Incentives, Information Technology, and Organized Processes to Improve Health Care Quality for Patients with Chronic Diseases. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003a;289(4):434–41. - PubMed
-
- Chuang K H, Luft H S, Dudley R A. The Clinical and Economic Performance of Prepaid Group Practices. In: Enthoven A, editor. The Contributions and Potential of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2004.
-
- Enthoven A, Tollen L, editors. Toward a 21st Century Health System: The Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Policy; 2004.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources