Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006;22(3):194-9.
doi: 10.1159/000094870. Epub 2006 Aug 7.

MMSE scores decline at a greater rate in frontotemporal degeneration than in AD

Affiliations
Comparative Study

MMSE scores decline at a greater rate in frontotemporal degeneration than in AD

Tiffany W Chow et al. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006.

Abstract

The clinical diagnostic criteria for frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) include relative preservation of memory and visuospatial function, in contradistinction to characteristics of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) contains items to assess these areas of cognition. In a retrospective case-control study of participants at two institutionally-based AD centers, we determined whether total MMSE and MMSE subscores would reflect the disease progression projected by the clinical criteria of FTD vs. AD. Participants were 44 subjects with FTD (7 pathologically confirmed) and 45 with pathologically confirmed AD. Each subject had at least two MMSEs with minimum inter-test intervals of 9 months. We compared annualized rates of change for total MMSE scores and cognitive domain subscores over time and between groups by two independent samples t-tests and proportion tests. The total MMSE score (p = 0.03) and language subscore (p = 0.02) showed a greater rate of decline for the FTD group than the AD group, although the constructional praxis item declined less rapidly in the FTD group (p = 0.018). Changes in MMSE subscores paralleled the clinical diagnostic criteria for FTD. The more rapid progression on the language subscore was observed in both language and behavioral variants of FTD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Annualized change scores for FTD vs. AD subjects show more rapid decline on the total MMSE and language subscore. Scores calculated as (last MMSE-initial MMSE)/time between the two scores. Error bars indicate 2 SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M, Boone K, Miller BL, Cummings J, Benson DF. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998;51:1546–1554. - PubMed
    1. McKhann GM, Albert MS, Grossman M, Miller B, Dickson D, Trojanowski JQ. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick’s Disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1803–1809. - PubMed
    1. Chow TW, Miller BL, Boone K, Mishkin F, Cummings J. Frontotemporal dementia classification and neuropsychiatry. Neurologist. 2002;8:263–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lipton AM, Benavides R, Hynan LS. Disease duration is shorter in frontotemporal dementia than in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2003;60(suppl 1):A377.
    1. Hodges JR, Davies R, Xuereb J, Kril J, Halliday G. Survival in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2003;61:349–354. - PubMed

Publication types