Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep;55(9):937-40, 942-3.
doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1077-5.

[Transesophageal echocardiography for non-cardiac surgery patients: superfluous luxury or essential diagnostic tool?]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Transesophageal echocardiography for non-cardiac surgery patients: superfluous luxury or essential diagnostic tool?]

[Article in German]
J Brederlau et al. Anaesthesist. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The value of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in non-cardiac critically ill patients has barely been studied.

Materials and methods: Over a period of 4 years TEE was used prospectively to evaluate patients with acute hemodynamic instability in non-cardiac critically ill patients in addition to standard care.

Results: A total of 363 TEE studies were performed in 339 selected patients. Volume depletion (169/47%) and regional wall motion abnormalities (97/27%) were the most frequent findings followed by global left ventricular dysfunction (79/22%). Of the TEE studies, 203 (56%) provided additional information with therapeutic relevance in 164 (45%) cases.

Conclusions: Transesophageal echocardiography provides additional information in critically ill non-cardiac patients with unexplained hemodynamic instability. In the majority of cases a clinical diagnosis is confirmed or improvement of volume resuscitation and catecholamine therapy can be achieved. In the minority of patients the results of TEE lead to distinct changes in medical management. Whether this improved diagnostic accuracy favours outcome, still needs to be evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chest. 1995 Mar;107(3):774-9 - PubMed
    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Aug;48(7):827-36 - PubMed
    1. Can J Anaesth. 2002 Mar;49(3):287-93 - PubMed
    1. Anaesthesia. 1998 Jan;53(1):55-68 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):179-95 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources