Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Jun;28(3):339-44.

[Efficacy of once-per-cycle administration pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a phase I trial]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 16900629
Clinical Trial

[Efficacy of once-per-cycle administration pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a phase I trial]

[Article in Chinese]
Sheng Yang et al. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Methods: Patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer or breast cancer and with normal bone marrow function were eligible for the trial. In the phase I trial, patients were to treated with two cycles of paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy every 21 days. In cycle 1, if absolute neutrophil count (ANC) dropped below 1.0 x 10(9)/ L with fever and/or ANC dropped below 0.5 x 10(9)/L, rhG-CSF 150 microg/d was administrated until WBC > or = 10 x 10(9)/L or ANC > or = 5.0 x 10(9)/L. In cycle 2, patients were to receive a single injection of PEG-rhG-CSF (30, 60, 100, or 200 microg/kg) 48 hours after chemotherapy. Pharmacodynamic analyses were performed.

Results: All the 16 patients enrolled (4 in each group) were eligible for efficacy evaluation. In cycle 1, 7 patients received rhG-CSF administration because of grade 4 neutropenia, while in cycle 2, there was only 1 episode of grade 4 neutropenia, which were in the 30 microg/kg group. In cycle 1, the mean ANC nadir of 1.37 x 10(9)/L occurred on day 13 in the 9 patients who received no rhG-CSF administration. In cycle 2, the mean ANC nadirs were 0.77 x 10(9)/L, 4.54 x 10(9)/L, 3.00 x 10(9)/L, and 5.56 x 10(9)/L, respectively, in 30, 60, 100, or 200 microg/kg group. The nadirs of the first two groups occurred on day 8 of cycle 2, while those of the other two groups appeared on day 7. After PEG-rhG-CSF administration, two mean ANC peaks were observed. The first one ranging from 20.87 x 10(9)/L to 33.61 x 10(9)/L in the 4 groups appeared on day 3 to day 4. In the 30 microg/ kg group, the mean ANC reached the second peak at 5.03 x 10(9)/L on day 14. The second peaks on day 10 in the other groups were 12.42 x 10(9)/L, 11.59 x 10(9)/L, and 18.92 x 10(9)/L, respectively. Pharmacodynamic analyses showed sustained serum concentrations of PEG-rhG-CSF during the period of neutropenia.

Conclusions: PEG-rhG-CSF administration may decrease the incidence of grade 4 neutopenia and result in earlier and higher nadir ANCs. PEG-rhG-CSF has a potential of once-per-cycle administration. The ANC and serum concentration of PEG-rhG-CSF are consistent with neutrophil receptor-mediated clearance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources