Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants
- PMID: 16901836
- PMCID: PMC1635527
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3569
Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants
Abstract
This study investigated whether women track possible cues of paternal and genetic quality in men's faces and then map perception of those cues onto mate attractiveness judgments. Men's testosterone concentrations served as a proxy for genetic quality given evidence that this hormone signals immunocompetence, and men's scores on an interest in infants test were chosen as prima facie markers of paternal quality. Women's perceptions of facial photographs of these men were in fact sensitive to these two variables: men's scores on the interest in infants test significantly predicted women's ratings of the photos for how much the men like children, and men's testosterone concentrations significantly predicted women's ratings of the men's faces for masculinity. Furthermore, men's actual and perceived affinity for children predicted women's long-term mate attractiveness judgments, while men's testosterone and perceived masculinity predicted women's short-term mate attractiveness judgments. These results suggest that women can detect facial cues of men's hormone concentrations and affinity for children, and that women use perception of these cues to form mate attractiveness judgments.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women's faces when their testosterone levels are high.Horm Behav. 2008 Nov;54(5):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Aug 7. Horm Behav. 2008. PMID: 18755192 Clinical Trial.
-
Men's judgments of women's facial attractiveness from two- and three-dimensional images are similar.J Vis. 2012 Nov 6;12(12):3. doi: 10.1167/12.12.3. J Vis. 2012. PMID: 23132932
-
Pregnant Women's Preferences for Men's Faces Differ Significantly from Nonpregnant Women.J Sex Med. 2015 May;12(5):1142-51. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12849. Epub 2015 Mar 5. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25754377
-
Sexual selection on human faces and voices.J Sex Res. 2012;49(2-3):227-43. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.658924. J Sex Res. 2012. PMID: 22380590 Review.
-
Evolutionary Theories and Men's Preferences for Women's Waist-to-Hip Ratio: Which Hypotheses Remain? A Systematic Review.Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01221. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31244708 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?Behav Ecol. 2013 May;24(3):579-589. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ars092. Epub 2012 Oct 24. Behav Ecol. 2013. PMID: 23555177 Free PMC article.
-
In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players.Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 22;275(1651):2651-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0873. Proc Biol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18713717 Free PMC article.
-
Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030366. Epub 2012 Jan 20. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22276184 Free PMC article.
-
Honest Signals of Status: Facial and Bodily Dominance Are Related to Success in Physical but Not Nonphysical Competition.Evol Psychol. 2019 Jul-Sep;17(3):1474704919863164. doi: 10.1177/1474704919863164. Evol Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31345060 Free PMC article.
-
Differential fitness costs of reproduction between the sexes.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 9;104(2):553-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609301103. Epub 2006 Dec 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. PMID: 17192400 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andersson M. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1994. Sexual selection.
-
- Berry D.S. Accuracy in social perception: contributions of facial and vocal information. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1991;61:298–307. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.298 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Berry D.S, Wero J.L.F. Accuracy in face perception: a view from ecological psychology. J. Pers. 1993;61:497–520.
-
- Buss D.M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 1989;12:1–49.
-
- Cunningham M.R, Barbee A.P, Pike C.L. What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male physical attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1990;59:61–72. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources