Haptic orientation perception: sex differences and lateralization of functions
- PMID: 16904136
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.032
Haptic orientation perception: sex differences and lateralization of functions
Abstract
The present study examined sex differences in haptic orientation representation using three tasks: a bimanual parallel-setting task comprising haptic orientation perception and motor matching action, and two unimanual tasks focusing on the perception and action elements separately. A verbal judgment task focused on haptic orientation perception: participants were to assign a number of minutes to a felt orientation. An orientation production task required the rotation of a bar to match a verbally presented number of minutes. Although both male and female performance was systematically biased we found that males are more accurate in parallel-setting and verbal judgment of orientation, suggesting differences in haptic orientation perception, in particular. Increasing allocentric reference frame involvement by delaying the action in the parallel-setting task did not affect the sex difference found. In addition to a male advantage over tasks, performance on both unimanual tasks suggests sex differences in lateralization of haptic orientation processing; a dependence on hand orientation was found only for right hand performance in males.
Similar articles
-
Evidence for automatic on-line adjustments of hand orientation during natural reaching movements to stationary targets.J Neurophysiol. 2008 Apr;99(4):1653-71. doi: 10.1152/jn.00980.2007. Epub 2008 Feb 6. J Neurophysiol. 2008. PMID: 18256170
-
Spatial ability and lateralization in the haptic modality.Brain Cogn. 1998 Feb;36(1):1-20. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0959. Brain Cogn. 1998. PMID: 9500884
-
Sex differences in spatial ability: a lateralization of function approach.Brain Cogn. 2004 Dec;56(3):332-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.002. Brain Cogn. 2004. PMID: 15522772 Clinical Trial.
-
Approaches to the study of haptic sensing.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;93(6):3036-43. doi: 10.1152/jn.00010.2005. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15911888 Review.
-
[Lateralization factors in the vertebrate brain].Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova. 1983 Jul;69(7):865-75. Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova. 1983. PMID: 6391964 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(3):467-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2500-3. Epub 2010 Dec 5. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21132493 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Changing the influence of the egocentric reference frame impacts deviations in haptic parallelity matching.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Sep;237(9):2387-2395. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05596-x. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 31292694 Free PMC article.
-
Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Sep;190(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1447-0. Epub 2008 Jun 14. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18553074 Free PMC article.
-
Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.Cogn Process. 2012 Nov;13(4):285-301. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0443-2. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Cogn Process. 2012. PMID: 22669262 Review.
-
Minute hands of clocks indicating the same time are not perceived as haptically parallel.Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 14;8(1):3001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21415-9. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29445191 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources