Peer assessment of dental attractiveness
- PMID: 16905059
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.018
Peer assessment of dental attractiveness
Abstract
Introduction: The objectives of the study were to determine the relative importance of various dental features that contribute to overall dental attractiveness and to test the validity of the concepts of golden proportion and golden percentage as applied to the human dentition.
Methods: Sixty 30-year-old subjects (29 men, 31 women) were selected from the 20-year longitudinal Cardiff Survey. Color photographs of the subjects' dentitions were taken with the lips retracted so that their teeth and gums were clearly exposed. Twelve nondentists, aged 32 to 33 years, equally divided according to sex, rated the subjects' dental appearances on a 5-point Likert attractiveness scale. The maxillary anterior teeth were measured, and relevant ratios were calculated and compared with the golden proportion. Factor analyses and linear regression were used to investigate the hierarchy of dental features, and variance components analysis was used to estimate interrater agreement.
Results and conclusions: Overall dental attractiveness did not depend on any particular feature of the dentition. A hierarchy of various features was established, with crown shape ranked highest, and tooth and gum color ranked lowest. The golden proportion and the golden percentage were not decisive factors in determining dental attractiveness.
Similar articles
-
Geometric and mathematical proportions and their relations to maxillary anterior teeth.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):62-70. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006. PMID: 17091141
-
An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions.J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Dec;94(6):530-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.007. J Prosthet Dent. 2005. PMID: 16316799
-
Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.017. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006. PMID: 16905057
-
Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):676-82; quiz 755. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.029. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15953892
-
[Gingival and dental parameters in evaluation of esthetic characteristics of fixed restoratons].Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2005 Mar-Apr;133(3-4):180-7. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2005. PMID: 16206709 Review. Serbian.
Cited by
-
Self-Evaluated Dental Appearance Satisfaction among Young Adults.Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Jul;4(4):603-7. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.139339. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014. PMID: 25221713 Free PMC article.
-
Morphological Diversity of Permanent Maxillary Lateral Incisors and Their Impact on Aesthetics and Function in Orthodontically Treated Patients.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;12(11):2759. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112759. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36428818 Free PMC article.
-
Awareness of Golden Proportion in Tooth Forms Among Dental Scholars in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus. 2023 Jun 19;15(6):e40619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40619. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37476121 Free PMC article.
-
Golden proportion assessment between maxillary and mandibular teeth on Indian population.J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 May;4(2):72-5. doi: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.72. Epub 2012 May 30. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012. PMID: 22737310 Free PMC article.
-
Smile Attractiveness Evaluation of Patients Selected for a U.S.-Based Board Certification Examination.Eur J Dent. 2021 Oct;15(4):630-638. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726670. Epub 2021 Jul 24. Eur J Dent. 2021. PMID: 34303318 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources