Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;92(2):120-7.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.087288. Epub 2006 Aug 11.

A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth

P Lucas  1 , L Arai, J Baird, J Kleijnen, C Law, H Roberts
Affiliations

A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth

P Lucas et al. Arch Dis Child. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To understand lay views on infant size and growth and their implications for a British population.

Methods: A systematic review of parental and other lay views about the meanings and importance of infant size and growth using Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, IBSS, ASSIA, British Nursing Index ChildData, Caredata, SIGLE, Dissertation Abstracts (US), Index to Theses. 19 studies, most of which reported the views of mothers, from the US, Canada, the UK and Finland were reviewed.

Results: Notions of healthy size and growth were dominated by the concept of normality. Participants created norms by assessing and comparing size and growth against several reference points. When size or growth differed from these norms, explanations were sought for factors that would account for this difference. When no plausible explanation could be found, growth or size became a worry for parents.

Conclusions: Parents consider the importance of contextual factors when judging what is appropriate or healthy growth. For public health advice to be effective, lay, as well as scientific, findings and values need to be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

References

    1. Barker D J, Winter P D, Osmond C.et al Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 19892577–580. - PubMed
    1. Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S.et al Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health 200458794–800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baird J, Lucas P, Fisher D.et al Defining optimal infant growth for lifetime health: a systematic review of lay and scientific literature. http://www.mrc.soton.ac.uk/index.asp?page = 176 (accessed 17 Nov 2006)
    1. Baird J, Fisher D, Lucas P.et al Being big or growing fast; a systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity. BMJ 2005331929–933. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher D, Baird J, Payne L.et al Are infant size and growth related to burden of disease in adulthood? A systematic review of literature. Int J Epidemiol 2006351196–1210. - PubMed

Publication types