Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug 15;175(4):361-5.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060108.

Revascularization in patients with heart failure

Affiliations

Revascularization in patients with heart failure

Ross T Tsuyuki et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Although practice guidelines recommend coronary revascularization for patients with heart failure, the evidence to support this recommendation is weak. The objective of our study was to determine the association of coronary revascularization with survival in patients who have had heart failure.

Methods: Data were obtained from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH), a clinical outcome-monitoring initiative that has captured data on all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in the province of Alberta since 1995. Our study included data from patients with a history of heart failure and with documented coronary artery disease; patients with normal coronary arteries or prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were excluded. We constructed survival curves and adjusted them by the corrected group prognosis method (incorporating all clinical variables in APPROACH). Propensity scores were used to account for clinical characteristics that could influence the decision to revascularize.

Results: A total of 2538 patients (mean age 68 yr, standard deviation [SD] 11 yr, 31% female) underwent revascularization; 1690 patients (mean age 69 [SD 11] yr, 34% female) did not. Crude 1-year mortality was 11.8% among patients who underwent revascularization, compared with 21.6% among those who did not. Adjusted survival curves diverged early and continued up to 7 years of follow-up (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.57). Propensity scores showed improved survival with revascularization across all quintiles of likelihood of revascularization.

Interpretation: This new evidence lends support to practice guidelines, which recommend revascularization in patients with heart failure and coronary disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Crude survival of patients with heart failure who underwent revascularization compared to those not revascularized. Upper panel, crude survival; lower panel, risk-adjusted survival.
None
Fig. 2: Survival of patients with heart failure, according to revascularization strategy. Upper panel, crude survival; lower panel, risk-adjusted survival.

Comment in

References

    1. Jessup M, Brozema S. Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2007-18. - PubMed
    1. Tsuyuki RT, Shibata MC, Nilsson C, et al. Contemporary burden of illness of congestive heart failure in Canada. Can J Cardiol 2003;19:436-8. - PubMed
    1. Liu P, Arnold M, Belenkie I, et al. The 2001 Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus guideline update for the management and prevention of heart failure. Can J Cardiol 2001;17(Suppl E):5E-24E. - PubMed
    1. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2101-13. - PubMed
    1. Chin MH, Goldman L. Factors contributing to the hospitalization of patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Public Health 1997;87:643-8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types