Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep;79(3):493-9.
doi: 10.1086/507565. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

X chromosome-inactivation patterns of 1,005 phenotypically unaffected females

Affiliations

X chromosome-inactivation patterns of 1,005 phenotypically unaffected females

James M Amos-Landgraf et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation is widely believed to be random in early female development and to result in a mosaic distribution of cells, approximately half with the paternally derived X chromosome inactive and half with the maternally derived X chromosome inactive. Significant departures from such a random pattern are hallmarks of a variety of clinical states, including being carriers for severe X-linked diseases or X-chromosome cytogenetic abnormalities. To evaluate the significance of skewed patterns of X inactivation, we examined patterns of X inactivation in a population of >1,000 phenotypically unaffected females. The data demonstrate that only a very small proportion of unaffected females show significantly skewed inactivation, especially during the neonatal period. By comparison with this data set, the degree of skewed inactivation in a given individual can now be quantified and evaluated for its potential clinical significance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure  1.
Figure 1.
The X-inactivation patterns of 1,005 females were assigned to 21 “bins” with a range of <2:98 to >98:2, with increments of 5%. These are normally distributed, with the mean of the distribution residing at 49:51 and the median at 50:50 (SD of the mean = 17).
Figure  2.
Figure 2.
Distributions of X-inactivation ratios of both newborn samples (n=590) and unaffected adult females (n=415).
Figure  3.
Figure 3.
Comparison of the newborn distribution with predicted normal distributions of varying stem-cell pool size. The solid black curve follows a normal distribution with use of the actual SD of the newborn samples (15.4 [fig. 2]). The estimated number of precursor stem cells predicted by the newborn SD is between 10 and 12 cells.

References

Web Resource

    1. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/ (for Duchenne muscular dystrophy)

References

    1. Lyon MF (1961) Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190:372–37310.1038/190372a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrel L, Willard HF (2005) X inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression. Nature 434:400–40410.1038/nature03479 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nance WE (1964) Genetic tests with a sex-linked marker: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 29:415–425 - PubMed
    1. Brown CJ, Robinson WP (2000) The causes and consequences of random and non-random X chromosome inactivation in humans. Clin Genet 58:353–36310.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580504.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willard HF (2000) The sex chromosomes and X chromosome inactivation. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Childs B, Vogelstein B (eds) The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1191–1221

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources