Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Mar;31(3):252-8.
doi: 10.1136/gut.31.3.252.

Prospective randomised trial of laser therapy only and laser therapy followed by endoscopic intubation for the palliation of malignant dysphagia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prospective randomised trial of laser therapy only and laser therapy followed by endoscopic intubation for the palliation of malignant dysphagia

H Barr et al. Gut. 1990 Mar.

Abstract

Forty six consecutive patients admitted for the relief of malignant dysphagia were prospectively randomised to receive laser therapy only or initial laser therapy followed by endoscopic intubation. Twenty patients were treated in each group with six exclusions. The patients' swallowing ability was assessed before and during the remainder of their life on a 0-4 scale with 0 being normal swallowing and 4 total dysphagia. The patient's quality of life was measured at the same times, using a physician's assessment (QL index) and the patient's own assessment using a linear analogue self assessment (LASA). There was a significant correlation between all the QL index and the LASA scores collected (n = 126; rs = 0.594, p less than 0.001). The mean monthly dysphagia grade correlated with the QL index (rs = 0.433, p less than 0.001) and the LASA (rs = 0.272, p less than 0.002). There was no significant difference in the dysphagia grade before or after treatment in either group. Dysphagia fluctuated more in those treated with the laser only, however, than in those with a tube inserted. There was also no significant difference in the quality of life measured between the two groups of patients. The complication rate (laser only 10%, laser/intubation 40%, p less than 0.05) was significantly higher in intubated patients. The recurrent dysphagia rate (laser only 25%, laser/intubation 45%, NS) was higher in patients treated with intubation, but they required fewer endoscopic procedures. Overall both procedures were effective in relieving dysphagia and in maintaining quality of life. There was no procedure related mortality in either group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Palliation of malignant dysphagia.
    Payne-James J, Misiewicz JJ, Silk D. Payne-James J, et al. Gut. 1990 Oct;31(10):1161. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.10.1161. Gut. 1990. PMID: 1707390 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1980 Apr;67(4):257-9 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1981 Apr;22(4):336-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1976 Apr 24;1(7965):899-900 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1974 Sep;61(9):683-8 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1978 Jul;19(7):669-71 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms