Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer
- PMID: 1691810
- DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92631-q
Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer
Abstract
The extent of tumour growth beyond the muscularis propria (mesorectal spread) was measured in specimens from 167 consecutive patients with rectal cancer. The 5-year survival was significantly greater in patients with slight mesorectal spread (4 mm or less) than in those with more extensive mesorectal spread (55% [95% confidence interval 42-66%] vs 25% [13-38%]). The prognostic value for survival of mesorectal spread was independent of the presence of lymphnode metastases. There were also significant differences in survival between patients with slight and extensive mesorectal spread among patients with Dukes' stage B tumours (66% [41-82%] vs 37% [14-60%]) and those with Dukes' stage C tumours (30% [12-52%] vs 18% [6-34%]). Thus mesorectal spread of rectal cancer is an important determinant of survival, and its accurate measurement may serve to subdivide Dukes' B and C cases. In this study tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin was not a useful predictor of local recurrence, but it did correlate with poor prognosis.
Comment in
-
Breaching the mesorectum.Lancet. 1990 May 5;335(8697):1067-8. Lancet. 1990. PMID: 1970374 No abstract available.
-
Mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin in rectal cancer.Lancet. 1990 Jun 9;335(8702):1402-3. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91281-e. Lancet. 1990. PMID: 1971682 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A 5- to 21-year follow-up and analysis of 250 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.Ann Surg. 1988 Sep;208(3):379-89. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198809000-00016. Ann Surg. 1988. PMID: 3421761 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients.Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):260-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133185.23514.32. Ann Surg. 2004. PMID: 15273550 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):808-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01256.x. Epub 2007 Apr 18. Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17441969
-
The pathological assessment of total mesorectal excision: what are the relevant resection margins?Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005;165:30-9. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27449-9_5. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005. PMID: 15865018 Review.
-
Dukes' classification of rectal cancer.South Med J. 1988 Mar;81(3):407-8. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198803000-00030. South Med J. 1988. PMID: 3279538 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Rectal cancer staging: focus on the prognostic significance of the findings described by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.Cancer Imaging. 2013 Jul 22;13(2):277-97. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0028. Cancer Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23876415 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients.Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):335-42. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000055270.48242.D2. Ann Surg. 2003. PMID: 12616116 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery on colorectal carcinoma.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(48):e8957. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008957. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29310394 Free PMC article.
-
General surgery.Postgrad Med J. 1991 Oct;67(792):876-91. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.67.792.876. Postgrad Med J. 1991. PMID: 1758797 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer.World J Surg. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):848-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02066981. World J Surg. 1992. PMID: 1462619 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical