Evaluation of focal liver lesions: fast-recovery fast spin echo T2-weighted MR imaging
- PMID: 16919552
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2006.02.006
Evaluation of focal liver lesions: fast-recovery fast spin echo T2-weighted MR imaging
Abstract
Purpose: To compare breath-hold fast-recovery fast spin echo (FR-FSE) and non-breath-hold fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted sequences for hepatic lesion conspicuity and image quality at MR imaging.
Materials and methods: Fifty-nine patients with known or suspected liver lesions underwent hepatic MR imaging by using a breath-hold FR-FSE T2-weighted sequence with and without fat suppression and a non-breath-hold FSE T2-weighted sequence with and without fat suppression. Quantitative analysis was made with measurements of the signal intensity of the liver, spleen, background noise, and up to three liver lesions, as well as calculations of the liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the liver-to-lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for each sequence. Qualitative analysis was made for image quality and the number of lesions identified. Statistical analysis was performed by using a single-tailed paired Student's t test with a 95% confidence interval.
Results: SNR and CNR were significantly higher (P<.05) for FSE with fat suppression than for FR-FSE with fat suppression. No statistically significant difference was seen in terms of SNR and CNR between non-fat-suppressed FSE and FR-FSE sequences. Lesion conspicuity, liver edge sharpness, and clarity of vessels were superior and ghosting was less with the FR-FSE sequences compared with the FSE sequences.
Conclusion: Breath-hold FR-FSE technique is a reasonable alternative in T2-weighted imaging of the liver.
Similar articles
-
Utility of breath-hold fast-recovery fast spin-echo t2 versus respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo T2 in clinical hepatic imaging.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Mar;184(3):842-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840842. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005. PMID: 15728606
-
Comparison of respiratory-triggered T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging versus breath-hold T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging: distinguishing benign from malignant liver lesions in patients with colorectal cancer.JBR-BTR. 2009 Jul-Aug;92(4):195-201. JBR-BTR. 2009. PMID: 19803097
-
Image quality and focal lesion detection on T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: comparison of two high-resolution free-breathing imaging techniques with two breath-hold imaging techniques.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Aug;26(2):323-30. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21002. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17610287
-
Motion artifact control in body MR imaging.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999 May;7(2):289-301. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999. PMID: 10382162 Review.
-
Fast spin-echo imaging of the brain.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1993 Winter;5(1):1-13. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1993. PMID: 8416684 Review.
Cited by
-
A Transfer Learning-Based Framework for Classifying Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients.Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 15;12(10):2345. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102345. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39457657 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging: Review of imaging techniques and overview of liver imaging.World J Radiol. 2010 Aug 28;2(8):309-22. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i8.309. World J Radiol. 2010. PMID: 21160685 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic Resonanance Imaging of the Liver (Including Biliary Contrast Agents)-Part 2: Protocols for Liver Magnetic Resonanance Imaging and Characterization of Common Focal Liver Lesions.Semin Roentgenol. 2016 Oct;51(4):317-333. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 May 30. Semin Roentgenol. 2016. PMID: 27743568 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical