Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Dec;91(12):1015-7.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.097246. Epub 2006 Aug 18.

Analgesic effect of watching TV during venipuncture

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Analgesic effect of watching TV during venipuncture

C V Bellieni et al. Arch Dis Child. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the analgesic effect of passive or active distraction during venipuncture in children.

Methods: We studied 69 children aged 7-12 years undergoing venipuncture. The children were randomly divided into three groups: a control group (C) without any distraction procedure, a group (M) in which mothers performed active distraction, and a TV group (TV) in which passive distraction (a TV cartoon) was used. Both mothers and children scored pain after the procedure.

Results: Main pain levels rated by the children were 23.04 (standard deviation (SD) 24.57), 17.39 (SD 21.36), and 8.91 (SD 8.65) for the C, M, and TV groups, respectively. Main pain levels rated by mothers were 21.30 (SD 19.9), 23.04 (SD 18.39), and 12.17 (SD 12.14) for the C, M, and TV groups, respectively. Scores assigned by mothers and children indicated that procedures performed during TV watching were less painful (p<0.05) than control or procedures performed during active distraction.

Conclusion: TV watching was more effective than active distraction. This was due either to the emotional participation of the mothers in the active procedure or to the distracting power of television.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Bellieni C V, Bagnoli F, Buonocore G. Alone no more: pain in premature children. Ethics Med 200319(1)5–9. - PubMed
    1. Cohen L L, Blount R L, Panopoulos G. Nurse coaching and cartoon distraction: an effective and practical intervention to reduce child, parent, and nurse distress during immunizations. J Pediatr Psychol 199722355–370. - PubMed
    1. Cassidy K ‐ L, Reid G J, McGrath P J.et al Watch needle, watch TV: audiovisual distraction in preschool immunization. Pain Med 20023108–118. - PubMed
    1. Manimala R, Blount R L, Cohen L L. The effects of parental reassurance versus distraction on child distress and coping during immunizations. Child Health Care 200029161–177.
    1. Vessey J A, Carlson K L, McGill J. Use of distraction with children during an acute pain procedure. Nurs Res 199443369–372. - PubMed

Publication types