Similar articles

• [Nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Rhythm conversion or anticoagulation?].

  Lengfelder W, Senges J. Lengfelder W, et al. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1992 Mar 27;117(13):505-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1062341. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1992. PMID: 1551376 Review. German. No abstract available.
• Atrial fibrillation: rate versus rhythm control.

  Amani F, Smith ES 3rd. Amani F, et al. J Ark Med Soc. 2005 Oct;102(4):110-2. J Ark Med Soc. 2005. PMID: 16265929 No abstract available.
• Is rate control or rhythm control preferable in patients with atrial fibrillation? Rate control is preferable to rhythm control in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation.

  Falk RH. Falk RH. Circulation. 2005 Jun 14;111(23):3141-50; discussion 3157. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.485565. Circulation. 2005. PMID: 15956148 No abstract available.
• Atrial fibrillation: rhythm control offers no advantage over rate control for some, but not all.

  Li YB, Hu CL, Liu J, Chen YX, Qu Z, Xu JL, Chen JB, Wan J, Tang QZ, Huang CX. Li YB, et al. Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(1):206-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.07.050. Epub 2006 Sep 29. Med Hypotheses. 2007. PMID: 17011138
• Rate control versus rhythm control.

  Vidaillet H, Greenlee RT. Vidaillet H, et al. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005 Jan;20(1):15-20. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 15596954 Review.