High frequency oscillatory ventilation: is equivalence with conventional mechanical ventilation enough?
- PMID: 16923930
- PMCID: PMC2672826
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.100487
High frequency oscillatory ventilation: is equivalence with conventional mechanical ventilation enough?
Abstract
A perspective on the article by Marlow et al (see page 320)
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: none declared
Comment on
-
Randomised trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation in babies of gestational age 28 weeks or less: respiratory and neurological outcomes at 2 years.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Sep;91(5):F320-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.079632. Epub 2006 May 11. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006. PMID: 16690640 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- HiFi Study Group High frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants: neurodevelopmental status at 16 to 24 months of post term age. J Pediatr 199017939–946. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources