Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Sep;244(3):343-52.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234932.88487.75.

Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study

Rabih A Chaer et al. Ann Surg. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Surgical simulation has been shown to enhance the training of general surgery residents. Since catheter-based techniques have become an important part of the vascular surgeon's armamentarium, we explored whether simulation might impact the acquisition of catheter skills by surgical residents.

Methods: Twenty general surgery residents received didactic training in the techniques of catheter intervention. Residents were then randomized with 10 receiving additional training with the Procedicus, computer-based, haptic simulator. All 20 residents then participated in 2 consecutive mentored catheter-based interventions for lower extremity occlusive disease in an OR/angiography suite. Resident performance was graded by attending surgeons blinded to the resident's training status, using 18 procedural steps as well as a global rating scale.

Results: There were no differences between the 2 resident groups with regard to demographics or scores on a visuospatial test administered at study outset. Overall, residents exposed to simulation scored higher than controls during the first angio/OR intervention: procedural steps (simulation/control) (50 +/- 6 vs. 33 +/- 9, P = 0.0015); global rating scale (30 +/- 7 vs. 19 +/- 5, P = 0.0052). The advantage provided by simulator training persisted with the second intervention (53 +/- 6 vs. 36 +/- 7, P = 0.0006); global rating scale (33 +/- 6 vs. 21 +/- 6, P = 0.0015). Moreover, simulation training, particularly for the second intervention, led to enhancement in almost all of the individual measures of performance.

Conclusion: Simulation is a valid tool for instructing surgical residents and fellows in basic endovascular techniques and should be incorporated into surgical training programs. Moreover, simulators may also benefit the large number of vascular surgeons who seek retraining in catheter-based intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. The Procedicus VIST endovascular simulation system.
None
FIGURE 2. Iliac angioplasty simulation model: an external iliac stenosis is visualized with a selective contrast injection delivered from a contralateral sheath pre and post angioplasty and stenting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. Available at: www.acgme.org.
    1. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–63; discussion 463–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, et al. Testing technical skill via an innovative ‘bench station’ examination. Am J Surg. 1997;173:226–230. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, et al. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscope. 1998;30:617–620. - PubMed
    1. Healy GB. The College should be instrumental in adapting simulators to education. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2002;8:10–12. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources