Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006;85(9):1080-9.
doi: 10.1080/00016340600697447.

Geographical variation in neonatal phenotype

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Geographical variation in neonatal phenotype

Sam Leary et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown associations between size and body proportions at birth and health outcomes throughout the life cycle, but there are few data on how neonatal phenotype varies in different populations around the world.

Methods: Data from the UK, Finland, India, Sri Lanka, China, DR Congo, Nigeria, and Jamaica (n=22,067) were used to characterize geographical differences in phenotype in singleton, live-born newborns. Measurements included birth weight, placental weight, length, head, chest, abdominal and arm circumferences, and skinfolds.

Results: Neonates in Europe were the largest, followed by Jamaica, East Asia (China), then Africa and South Asia. Birth weight varied widely (mean values 2,730-3,570 g), but in contrast, head circumference was similar in all except China (markedly smaller). The main difference in body proportions between populations was the head to length ratio, with small heads relative to length in China and large heads relative to length in South Asia and Africa.

Conclusions: These marked geographical differences in neonatal phenotype need to be considered when investigating determinants of fetal growth, and optimal phenotype for short-term and long-term outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Mean (± 2SD) birthweight (g) by study
Figure 1b
Figure 1b
Mean (± 2SD) head circumference (cm) by study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barker DJP. Mothers, babies and health in later life. Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh: 1998.
    1. Phipps K, Barker DJ, Hales CN, Fall CH, Osmond C, Clark PM. Fetal growth and impaired glucose tolerance in men and women. Diabetologia. 1993;36:225–8. - PubMed
    1. Forsén T, Eriksson J, Tuomilehto J, Reunanen A, Osmond C, Barker D. The fetal and childhood growth of persons who develop type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:176–82. - PubMed
    1. Fall CH, Stein CE, Kumaran K, Cox V, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Hales CN. Size at birth, maternal weight, and type 2 diabetes in South India. Diabet Med. 1998;15:220–7. - PubMed
    1. Gairdner D, Pearson J. A growth chart for premature and other infants. Arch Dis Child. 1971;46:783–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms