Estimation of the optimum loading of an antibiotic powder in an acrylic bone cement: gentamicin sulfate in SmartSet HV
- PMID: 16929440
- DOI: 10.1080/17453670610012700
Estimation of the optimum loading of an antibiotic powder in an acrylic bone cement: gentamicin sulfate in SmartSet HV
Abstract
Background: In some countries, commercially available antibiotic powder-loaded acrylic bone cement is routinely used in joint replacement, while, in others, "off-label" formulations are used in selected procedures (where the antibiotic powder is blended manually with the powder of a plain cement in the operating room/theater by either the surgeon or approved personnel). In the latter situation, an arbitrary rather than a rational approach is used for deciding on the amount of the antibiotic that is blended with the cement powder (herein referred to as "the antibiotic powder loading").
Methods and results: The first objective of this study was to present two methods for estimating the optimum loading of gentamicin sulfate powder that may be blended manually with the powder of a commercially available acrylic bone cement, ABC (Wopt). The second objective was to define the challenges associated with each of these methods. The loading (W) was optimized with respect to two key properties of the cured cement that were obtained simultaneously, namely (1) fatigue life in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) at 37 degrees C, and (2) the rate of elution of the gentamicin from the cement (E) in that medium. Three sets of specimens were used, containing 2.25, 4.25 and 11.50 wt/wt% of the gentamicin that was blended manually with the cement powder. The fatigue tests involved determining the number of cycles at which a specimen fractured (Nf) when subjected to fully-reversed tension-compression sinusoidal load, +/- 15 MPa at 2 Hz. E was determined from the concentration of gentamicin in the PBS solution when the specimen fractured, using fluorescence polarization immunoassay for the measurement. Consistent with a priori expectations, it was found that, with increase in W, Nf decreased while E increased. Two approaches for obtaining an estimate of Wopt are described, a mathematical method and an empirical one, that lead to Wopt values of 6.50 wt/wt% and 4.78 wt/wt%, respectively. Thus, this antibiotic loading ranges from about the same to about 92% greater than that in SmartSet GHV Gentamicin, which is a commercially available bone cement used clinically and which has the same composition as SmartSet HV except for the presence of gentamicin sulfate in its powder (blended in by the manufacturer).
Interpretation: We present and critically compare two rational methods of determining the optimum loading of an antibiotic powder in an acrylic bone cement, which should serve as a guide when using "off-label" antibiotic powder-loaded acrylic bone cements in cemented joint replacements.
Similar articles
-
Influence of the method of blending an antibiotic powder with an acrylic bone cement powder on physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the cured cement.Biomaterials. 2005 Jul;26(20):4317-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.003. Biomaterials. 2005. PMID: 15683656
-
Influence of a pre-blended antibiotic (gentamicin sulfate powder) on various mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of three acrylic bone cements.J Biomater Appl. 2006 Apr;20(4):377-408. doi: 10.1177/0885328206055124. Epub 2006 Jan 27. J Biomater Appl. 2006. PMID: 16443619
-
Gentamicin release from two-solution and powder-liquid poly(methyl methacrylate)-based bone cements by using novel pH method.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004 Jun 1;69(3):577-83. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30033. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004. PMID: 15127405
-
Antibiotic bone cements: their use in routine primary total joint arthroplasty is justified.Orthopedics. 2009 Sep;32(9):orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=42849. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-20. Orthopedics. 2009. PMID: 19751021 Review.
-
Antibiotic-loaded bone cement and periprosthetic joint infection.J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2014;24(2-3):89-97. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2013010238. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2014. PMID: 25272207 Review.
Cited by
-
An Approach for determining antibiotic loading for a physician-directed antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement formulation.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2092-100. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1281-0. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 20195806 Free PMC article.
-
Increased antibiotic release from a bone cement containing bacterial cellulose.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):600-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1626-8. Epub 2010 Oct 13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011. PMID: 20945120 Free PMC article.
-
Composite Bone Cements with Enhanced Drug Elution.Polymers (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;15(18):3757. doi: 10.3390/polym15183757. Polymers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37765611 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of the controlled release of gentamicin from polyelectrolyte multilayers in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection in a rabbit bone model.Biomaterials. 2010 Aug;31(23):6019-30. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 May 21. Biomaterials. 2010. PMID: 20488534 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI): A Clinical Practice Protocol in High-Risk Patients.Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 11;5(4):186. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed5040186. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 33322463 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical