The epidemiology of sepsis--is Australasia different?
- PMID: 16930108
The epidemiology of sepsis--is Australasia different?
Abstract
Sepsis is a common reason for intensive care unit admission and a leading cause of mortality. Recent prospective randomised controlled trials have shown improved outcomes for patients with severe sepsis. Implementation of these findings into clinical practice has varied. Reasons appear complex but may include regional differences in the epidemiology of sepsis. To improve clinicians' understanding of sepsis, multiple epidemiological studies have been performed in the past 15 years. Differences in study populations and methodology make comparison difficult. After allowing for these differences, it is likely that the percentage of patients with severe sepsis in ICUs is less in Australasia than in many other developed nations. However, the population incidence, mortality, site and causative agent of infection are probably similar. This suggests that treatments and strategies whose efficacy has been demonstrated in other jurisdictions will also be effective in Australasia.
Similar articles
-
The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):8-18. Crit Care Resusc. 2007. PMID: 17352661
-
[Peritonitis: main reason of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care].Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Apr;132(2):130-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960478. Zentralbl Chir. 2007. PMID: 17516319 German.
-
Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward.Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5):1284-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260960.94300.DE. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17414725
-
Why is there such a difference in outcome between Australian intensive care units and others?Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Apr;20(2):100-5. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32802c7cd5. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007. PMID: 17413391 Review.
-
Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the intensive care unit.Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2008 Aug;69(8):442-3. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2008.69.8.30739. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2008. PMID: 18783090 Review.
Cited by
-
Pro/Con debate: is procalcitonin useful for guiding antibiotic decision making in critically ill patients?Crit Care. 2008;12(3):211. doi: 10.1186/cc6860. Epub 2008 May 2. Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 18466649 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous