Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug 24:1:14.
doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-14.

Social acceptability of treatments for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Social acceptability of treatments for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study

Stefano Negrini et al. Scoliosis. .

Abstract

Background: There are no data on social acceptability of scoliosis. Aim. To elicit evidence-based opinions on therapeutic strategies for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in a sample of families with not affected children, so to understand the social perception of this issue.

Methods: Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. Secondary schools in 4 northern Italian regions. Participants. Parents of children in the age group at risk of and not affected by scoliosis (Pre-test group = 100, Study group = 3,162). Interventions. Questionnaire: five specific and evidence-based questions regarding scoliosis treatment options and a socio-demographic section. Methodology. "Role-playing" in which it was required to normal people to answer what they would have chosen if they had been in the situation proposed. Main outcome measures. Perception of acceptability of treatments for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the general population (social acceptability).

Results: The families support the use of screening (94.8%) at school, immediate bracing (76.4%) for scoliosis with a 60% risk of progression, but also therapeutic exercises (86.9%) in cases with a 25% risk of progression.

Conclusion: There is a growing tendency to consider not only the efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of treatments, but also their acceptability. This patient-centred aspect is especially more important in areas (like adolescent idiopathic scoliosis) in which there is some evidence on the efficacy of treatments, but not strong and definitive (RCTs). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatments should thus be carefully considered also in the light of their social acceptability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anynsley-Gent A, Barker M, Burr S, Macfarlane A, Morgan J, Sibert J. Who is speaking for children and adolescents and for their health at the policy level. bmj. 2000;321:229–232. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7255.229. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinstein SL. Natural history. Spine. 1999;24:2592–2600. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199912150-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. Jama. 2003;289:559–567. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.5.559. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dickson RA. Spinal deformity--adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nonoperative treatment. Spine. 1999;24:2601–2606. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199912150-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sponseller PD. Sizing up scoliosis. Jama. 2003;289:608–609. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.5.608. - DOI - PubMed