Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990:26 Suppl:S59-62.
doi: 10.1007/BF00685422.

Neoadjuvant bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin in cervical cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Neoadjuvant bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin in cervical cancer

J Tobias et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990.

Abstract

Patients with advanced and bulky early-stage cancer of the cervix have an unfavourable prognosis, which may be improved by initial neoadjuvant, cytoreductive chemotherapy. In a phase II study, coordinated at the West Midlands CRC Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, using ifosfamide (IFX) in combination with cisplatin and bleomycin (BIP) in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer, we demonstrated a response rate of 69%. This regimen produces rapid responses with acceptable toxicity and has potential for use as neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical radiotherapy in patients presenting with advanced and bulky early-stage disease. In an initial pilot study of this approach, 13 of 19 patients (68%) with primary inoperable disease showed significant tumour regression prior to radical local radiotherapy. Interim analysis of the first 66 patients entered into a randomized study evaluating the value of this approach has shown complete clinical tumour resolution after radical radiotherapy in 24/32 patients (75%) treated with up to three cycles of BIP prior to radiotherapy vs 19/34 patients (56%) treated with radiotherapy alone. There was no evidence that neoadjuvant chemotherapy enhances the acute toxic effects of pelvic radiotherapy. This approach has the potential for improving the outlook in patients with poor-prognosis primary disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Semin Oncol. 1982 Sep;9(3):312-30 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Jun;94(6):583-8 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;71(3 Pt 1):344-8 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1977 Mar;39(3):1243-6 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 1987 May;38(3):273-4 - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts