Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Nov;24(4):697-713.
doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2006.06.004.

Intracranial angioplasty and stenting for cerebrovascular disease

Affiliations
Review

Intracranial angioplasty and stenting for cerebrovascular disease

Lotfi Hacein-Bey et al. Neurol Clin. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

The use of stent-assisted techniques to manage a variety of cerebrovascular conditions has exploded in recent years. Although the safety of devices is expected to continue to improve, the absence of scientific validation remains an issue in many indications. In posterior circulation arterial disease, considering the absence of valid and reasonable surgical options and the results of the WASID trial, there is widespread consensus that endovascular therapy will become the main option. In anterior circulation intracranial disease, surgical revascularization (EC/IC bypass) may continue to remain an option in selected patients, although it is unclear whether or not randomized clinical trials would be either useful or feasible. The treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms has benefited greatly from the advent of stenting. Intracranial arterial dissections are uncommon and life threatening enough for stenting to remain a major, if not the only, treatment option in many; flexible covered microstents may become the preferred treatment in arterial segments that do not harbor perforators. Concerning the endovascular management of pseudotumor cerebri, as more insight is gained into the epidemiology and the pathophysiology of the disease, it is likely that validation against conventional surgical shunt techniques will be required, at least in subgroups of patients. There is no doubt at this point that large numbers of patients will continue to benefit from the technique. A strong focus on patients' specific needs, a thorough multidisciplinary approach, and continuing efforts in research are necessary to help maintain procedural risks as low as possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources