Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue
- PMID: 16935344
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.034
Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue
Abstract
Purpose: To compare outcomes with 2 donor dissection methods for Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).
Design: Retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized case series.
Participants: Three hundred thirty consecutive transplants, 114 with manually dissected and 216 with microkeratome-dissected donor tissue.
Methods: Donor posterior stroma/endothelium was transplanted, after stripping recipient Descemet's membrane/endothelium and dissecting the donor tissue by hand or with a microkeratome.
Main outcome measures: Incidences of donor perforation and donor detachment were compared for all eyes. Visual and refractive outcomes were compared for the first 100 consecutive eyes in each group.
Results: Visual recovery was faster with microkeratome-dissected donor tissue, as evidenced by statistically better best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (VA) in that group 1 month after surgery (P = 0.015). Best spectacle-corrected VA was statistically comparable for the 2 groups preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Best spectacle-corrected VA was not correlated significantly with postoperative central corneal thickness (P = 0.25). Corneal thickness was significantly higher in the microkeratome group (690+/-77 mum, compared with 610+/-62 mum after hand dissection; P<0.0001). Mean refractive astigmatism was 1.5 diopters (D) preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively in both groups. Spherical equivalent refraction did not change in the microkeratome group (P = 0.64) but increased by 0.66 D in the hand dissection group (P = 0.0007). Methods designed to remove fluid from the donor/recipient graft interface ultimately reduced the detachment rate to <1% (1 in the last 140 cases). No donor perforations occurred in 216 microkeratome dissections, compared with 5 in 114 hand dissections (P = 0.002).
Conclusions: Microkeratome dissection reduced the risk of donor tissue perforation, provided faster visual recovery after DSEK, and did not alter the refractive outcome.
Similar articles
-
Early results of small-incision Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.Ophthalmology. 2007 Feb;114(2):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.056. Epub 2006 Dec 5. Ophthalmology. 2007. PMID: 17156845
-
Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Apr 28. Ophthalmology. 2008. PMID: 18440638
-
Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.078. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006. PMID: 16631048
-
Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.Ophthalmology. 2009 Sep;116(9):1818-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Jul 30. Ophthalmology. 2009. PMID: 19643492 Review.
-
Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;18(4):290-4. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3281a4775b. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17568204 Review.
Cited by
-
[Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].Ophthalmologe. 2012 Nov;109(11):1093-7. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2623-y. Ophthalmologe. 2012. PMID: 22752628 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Traumatic Wound Dehiscence following Corneal Transplantation.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012 Jul;7(3):214-8. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012. PMID: 23264863 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1284-2. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20111972
-
[Keratoplasty: laminate or penetrate? Part 2: lamellar keratoplasty].Ophthalmologe. 2009 Jul;106(7):649-62; quiz 663. doi: 10.1007/s00347-009-1943-z. Ophthalmologe. 2009. PMID: 19543736 Review. German.
-
Persistence of structural changes at the anterior cornea in bullous keratopathy patients after endothelial keratoplasty.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 16;8(9):e74279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074279. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24066132 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical