Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Sep;142(3):513-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.03.060.

Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy

Kazuaki Kadonosono et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of 25-gauge vitrectomy with 20-gauge vitrectomy for macular pucker.

Design: Randomized clinical study.

Methods: Sixty-seven eyes (67 patients) with macular pucker were prospectively and randomly assigned to undergo 20-gauge vitrectomy or 25-gauge vitrectomy as a control group. Main outcome measurements consisted of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean induced astigmatism, total operation time, and postoperative complications.

Results: The mean BCVA at baseline and at one month and six months after surgery was 20/78, 20/62, and 20/42, respectively, in the 20-gauge group, and 20/85, 20/45, and 20/40 in the 25-gauge group. A significant difference in change in the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution of BCVA between 20-gauge and 25-gauge was found at one month (-0.10 vs -0.269, P < .001), but not at six months (-0.327 vs -0.276, P > .01).

Conclusions: If faster visual improvement is desired, 25-gauge vitrectomy may be preferable to 20-gauge vitrectomy for macular pucker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources