Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;63(1):41-52.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02752.x. Epub 2006 Aug 30.

Population pharmacokinetics of darbepoetin alfa in healthy subjects

Affiliations

Population pharmacokinetics of darbepoetin alfa in healthy subjects

Balaji Agoram et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: To develop and evaluate a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of the long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating protein, darbepoetin alfa in healthy subjects.

Methods: PK profiles were obtained from 140 healthy subjects receiving single intravenous and/or single or multiple subcutaneous doses of darbepoetin alfa (0.75-8.0 microg kg(-1), or either 80 or 500 microg). Data were analysed by a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach using NONMEM software. Influential covariates were identified by covariate analysis emphasizing parameter estimates and their confidence intervals, rather than stepwise hypothesis testing. The model was evaluated by comparing simulated profiles (obtained using the covariate model) to the observed profiles in a test dataset.

Results: The population PK model, including first-order absorption, two-compartment disposition and first-order elimination, provided a good description of data. Modelling indicated that for a 70-kg human, the observed nearly twofold disproportionate dose-exposure relationship at the 8.0 microg kg(-1)-dose relative to the 0.75 microg kg(-1)-dose may reflect changing relative bioavailability, which increased from approximately 48% at 0.75 microg kg(-1) to 78% at 8.0 microg kg(-1). The covariate analysis showed that increasing body weight may be related to increasing clearance and central compartment volume, and that the absorption rate constant decreased with increasing age. The full covariate model performed adequately in a fixed-effects prediction test against an external dataset.

Conclusion: The developed population PK model describes the inter- and intraindividual variability in darbepoetin alfa PK. The model is a suitable tool for predicting the PK response of darbepoetin alfa using clinically untested dosing regimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Exploratory graphics analysis of data. (a) Mean of model development dataset serum darbepoetin alfa concentration profiles, 0.75 µg/kg SC, IV (n = 4) (formula image), 8 µg/kg (n = 10) (formula image), 6.5 µg/kg (n = 10) (formula image), 5 µg/kg (n = 6) (formula image), 3 µg/kg (n = 6) (formula image), 2 µg/kg (n = 6) (formula image), 1 µg/kg (n = 28) (formula image), (b) change in exposure measured by dose-normalized AUC0–∞ (□) and Cmax (✦), along with the standard deviations and number of subjects are plotted against administered darbepoetin alfa s.c. dose; (c) mean (+ SD) of model evaluation dataset serum concentration–time profiles after first and second doses for selected dose groups. 500 µg (n = 4–10) (•), 6.5 µg/kg (n = 5–10) (formula image), 3 µg/kg (n = 5–10) (▾). n, Number of individual observations at each time point
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter–covariate relationships in the base PK model. ETA (η) is the interindividual variance parameter (see equation 1)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plot of estimated bioavailability vs. dose from the full covariate pharmacokinetic model. Bioavailability was estimated at 0.75, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, 6.5 and 8.0 µg kg−1 doses using the linear equation fit to the data
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diagnostic plots of the full pharmacokinetic model. (a) Mean predicted (PRED) and individual predicted (IPRED) vs. observed (OBS) serum darbepoetin alfa concentrations are plotted on a log scale. The data points represent individual observations. (b) Plot of the weighted residuals (WRES) vs. PRED
Figure 5
Figure 5
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter–covariate relationships in the full covariate PK model. ETA (η) is the interindividual variance parameter (see equation 1)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Summary of the fixed-effects prediction. Mean predicted (dotted line) and mean (±SD) observed (solid line) serum darbepoetin alfa concentration–time profiles at the dose levels in the test dataset are shown. 500 µg (•), 6.5 µg/kg (▿), 3 µg/kg (▪), 2 µg/kg (◊), 80 µg (▴), Mean predicted (formula image), Mean (SD) observed (——)
Figure 7
Figure 7
Evaluation of effect size of influential covariates. Darbepoetin alfa serum concentration profiles after a 100-µg fixed dose, simulated using the full covariate model fixed-effect parameters at the extremes of the ranges of the covariates body weight (solid line) and age (hashed line). 50 kg (formula image), 90 kg (formula image), 30 yr (formula image), 80 yr (formula image)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macdougall IC. Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein. Semin Nephrol. 2000;20:375–81. - PubMed
    1. Egrie JC, Dwyer E, Browne JK, Hitz A, Lyjos MA. Darbepoetin alfa has a longer circulating half-life and greater in vivo potency than recombinant human erythropoietin. Exp Hematol. 2003;31:290–9. - PubMed
    1. Locatelli F, Olivares J, Walker R, Wilkie M, Jenkins B, Dewey C, Gray SJ. Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein for treatment of anemia in chronic renal insufficiency. Kidney Int. 2001;60:741–7. - PubMed
    1. Nissenson AR, Swan SK, Lindberg JS, Soroka SD, Beatey R, Wang C, Picarello N, McDermott-Vitak A, Maroni BJ. Randomized, controlled trial of darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:110–8. - PubMed
    1. Vanrenterghem Y, Barany P, Mann JF, Kerr PG, Wilson J, Baker NF, Gray SJ. Randomized trial of darbepoetin alfa for treatment of renal anemia at a reduced dose frequency compared with rHuEPO in dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62:2167–75. - PubMed