Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Apr;83(2):97-101.
doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.021402. Epub 2006 Aug 30.

Serological response to syphilis treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Serological response to syphilis treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics

K G Ghanem et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Background: HIV-positive patients treated for syphilis may be at increased risk for serological failure.

Objective: To compare follow-up serologies and serological responses to treatment between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending two sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics.

Study design: Existing records were reviewed from HIV-positive patients who were diagnosed and treated for syphilis at the public STD clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, between 1992 and 2000. Results of their serological follow-up were compared with those of HIV-negative clinic patients at the time of syphilis treatment. Failure was defined as lack of a fourfold drop in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titre by 400 days after treatment or a fourfold increased titre between 30 and 400 days.

Results: Of the 450 HIV-positive patients with syphilis, 288 (64%) did not have documented follow-up serologies and 129 (28.5%) met the inclusion criteria; 168 (17%) of 1000 known HIV-negative patients were similarly eligible. There were 22 failures in the HIV-positive group and 5 in the HIV-negative group (p<0.001). The median times to successful serological responses in both groups were 278 (95% confidence interval (CI) 209 to 350) and 126 (95% CI 108 to 157) days, respectively (p<0.001). A multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model showed an increased risk of serological failure among the HIV-positive patients (hazards ratio 6.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 23.9; p = 0.01).

Conclusion: HIV-positive patients treated for syphilis may be at higher risk of serological failure. Despite recommendations for more frequent serological follow-up, most patients did not have documentation of serological response after standard treatment for syphilis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Quinn T C, Glasser D, Cannon R O.et al Human immunodeficiency virus infection among patients attending clinics for sexually transmitted diseases. N Engl J Med 1988318197–203. - PubMed
    1. Ansell D A, Hu T C, Straus M.et al HIV and syphilis seroprevalence among clients with sexually transmitted diseases attending a walk‐in clinic at Cook County Hospital. Sex Transm Dis 19942193–96. - PubMed
    1. Blocker M E, Levine W C, St Louis M E. HIV prevalence in patients with syphilis, United States. Sex Transm Dis 20002753–59. - PubMed
    1. Gadkari D A, Quinn T C, Gangakhedkar R R.et al HIV‐1 DNA shedding in genital ulcers and its associated risk factors in Pune, India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 199818277–281. - PubMed
    1. Buchacz K, Patel P, Taylor M.et al Syphilis increases HIV viral load and decreases CD4 cell counts in HIV‐infected patients with new syphilis infections. AIDS 2004182075–2079. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types