Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan 1;6(1):6-16.

Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Affiliations

Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

H Pürerfellner et al. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. .

Abstract

Introduction: Segmental ostial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is considered a potentially curative therapeutic approach in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). There is only limited data available on the long-term effect of this procedure.

Methods: Patients (Pts) underwent a regular clinical follow up visit at 3, 6 and 24 months after PVI. Clinical success was classified as complete (i.e. no arrhythmia recurrences, no antiarrhythmic drug), partial (i.e. no/only few recurrences, on drug) or as a failure (no benefit). The clinical responder rate (CRR) was determined by combining complete and partial success.

Results: 117 patients (96 male, 21 female), aged 51+/-11 years (range 25 to 73) underwent a total of 166 procedures (1.4/patient) in 2-4 pulmonary veins (PV). 115 patients (98%) had AF, 2 patients presented with regular PV atrial tachycardia. ,109/115 patients. exhibited PAF as the primary arrhythmia (versus persistent AF). A total of 113 patients with PVI in the years 2001 to 2003 were evaluated for their CRR after 6 (3) months. A single intervention was carried out in 63 patients (55.8%), two interventions were performed in 45 patients (39.8%) and three interventions in 5 patients (4.4%). The clinical response demonstrated a complete success of 52% (59 patients), a partial success of 26% (29 patients) and a failure rate of 22% (25 patients), leading to a CRR of 78% (88 patients). Ostial PVI in all 4 PVs exhibited a tendency towards higher curative success rates (54% versus 44% in patients with 3 PVs ablated for the 6 month follow up). Long-term clinical outcome was evaluated in 39 patients with an ablation attempt at 3 PVs only (excluding the right inferior PV in our early experience) and a mean clinical follow up of 21+/-6 months. At this point in time the success rate was 41% (complete, 16 patients) and 21% (partial, 8 patients), respectively, adding up to a CRR of 62% (24 patients). In total, 20 patients (17.1%) had either a single or 2 (3 patients, 2.6%) complications independent of the number of procedures performed with PV stenosis as the leading cause (7.7%).

Conclusion: The CRR of patients with medical refractory PAF in our patient cohort is 78% at the 6 month follow up. PV stenosis is the main cause for procedure-related complications. Ablation of all 4 PV exhibits a tendency towards higher complete success rates despite equal CRR. Calculation of the clinical response after a mid- to long-term follow of 21+/-6 months in those patients with an ostial PVI in only 3 pulmonary veins (sparing the right inferior PV) shows a further reduction to 62%, exclusively caused by a drop in patients with a former partial success. To evaluate the long-term clinical benefit of segmental ostial PVI in comparison with other ablation techniques, more extended follow up periods are mandatory, including a larger study cohort and a detailed description of procedural parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative percentage of primary, scondary and teriary procedures per patient and per year of ablation (of the primary procedure)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Success rates in the short- and longterm follow up period
Figure 3
Figure 3
Success rates in a 3 versus a 4 PV approach (including the RIPV)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Success rates per year of ablation performed
a
a
b
b
Figure 6
Figure 6
Multislice CT demonstrating aortic (above), pulmonary arterial (mid) and pulmonary venous vasculature (posterioanterior projection)

Similar articles

References

    1. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonaty veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:659–666. - PubMed
    1. Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, Jais P. Electrophysiological breakthroughs from the left atrium to the pulmonary veins. Circulation. 2000;102:2463–2465. - PubMed
    1. Karch MR, Zrenner B, Deisenhofer I. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. A randomized comparison between 2 current ablations strategies. Circulation research. 2005;111:2875–2880. - PubMed
    1. Pappone C, Rosanio S, Augello G, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and quality of life after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: outcomes from a controlled non-randomized long-term study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:185–197. - PubMed
    1. Pürerfellner H, Aichinger J, Nesser HJ, et al. Segmentale ostiale Katheterablation der Pulmonalvenen bei paroxysmalem Vorhofflimmern: Ergebnisse nach einjähriger Erfahrung. J Kardiol. 2002;9:497–505.

LinkOut - more resources