Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep;13(5):642-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.06.131.

Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT

Affiliations

Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT

Piotr J Slomka et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to compare normal limits and the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) with attenuation-corrected (AC) and non-attenuation-corrected (NC) myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS) by use of a recently improved automated quantification technique.

Methods and results: We acquired 415 rest/stress technetium 99m MPS studies on a Vertex dual-detector camera with a gadolinium 153 line source (Vantage Pro). Gender-specific NC, AC, and gender-combined AC normal limits were created from rest/stress images of 50 women and 50 men with a low likelihood of CAD (< 5%) and a median body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 in each gender group. BMI-specific normal limits (< 30 kg/m2 and > or = 30 kg/m2) were also compared. Total perfusion deficit and 17-segment summed scores in 174 patients were compared with angiography, and normalcy rates were established from 141 studies of low-likelihood patients. There were no differences between low-BMI and high-BMI normal limits for AC or NC studies. Male and female normal limits differed in 12 of 17 segments for NC stress studies and in 3 of 17 segments for AC stress studies (P < .01). The sensitivity, specificity, and normalcy rates for stenoses with 70% narrowing or greater were 89%, 73%, and 91%, respectively, for NC studies and 87%, 80%, and 95%, respectively, for AC studies (P = not significant).

Conclusion: Automated detection of CAD by AC and NC MPS demonstrated similar sensitivity, specificity, and normalcy rates. Some gender differences were noted for AC normal limits.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002 Feb;18(1):539-42 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):676-86 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12 (1):66-77 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jun 14;300(24):1350-8 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 May-Jun;11(3):273-81 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources