Specificity of molecular interactions in transient protein-protein interaction interfaces
- PMID: 16948160
- DOI: 10.1002/prot.21056
Specificity of molecular interactions in transient protein-protein interaction interfaces
Abstract
In this study, we investigate what types of interactions are specific to their biological function, and what types of interactions are persistent regardless of their functional category in transient protein-protein heterocomplexes. This is the first approach to analyze protein-protein interfaces systematically at the molecular interaction level in the context of protein functions. We perform systematic analysis at the molecular interaction level using classification and feature subset selection technique prevalent in the field of pattern recognition. To represent the physicochemical properties of protein-protein interfaces, we design 18 molecular interaction types using canonical and noncanonical interactions. Then, we construct input vector using the frequency of each interaction type in protein-protein interface. We analyze the 131 interfaces of transient protein-protein heterocomplexes in PDB: 33 protease-inhibitors, 52 antibody-antigens, 46 signaling proteins including 4 cyclin dependent kinase and 26 G-protein. Using kNN classification and feature subset selection technique, we show that there are specific interaction types based on their functional category, and such interaction types are conserved through the common binding mechanism, rather than through the sequence or structure conservation. The extracted interaction types are C(alpha)-- H...O==C interaction, cation...anion interaction, amine...amine interaction, and amine...cation interaction. With these four interaction types, we achieve the classification success rate up to 83.2% with leave-one-out cross-validation at k = 15. Of these four interaction types, C(alpha)--H...O==C shows binding specificity for protease-inhibitor complexes, while cation-anion interaction is predominant in signaling complexes. The amine ... amine and amine...cation interaction give a minor contribution to the classification accuracy. When combined with these two interactions, they increase the accuracy by 3.8%. In the case of antibody-antigen complexes, the sign is somewhat ambiguous. From the evolutionary perspective, while protease-inhibitors and sig-naling proteins have optimized their interfaces to suit their biological functions, antibody-antigen interactions are the happenstance, implying that antibody-antigen complexes do not show distinctive interaction types. Persistent interaction types such as pi...pi, amide-carbonyl, and hydroxyl-carbonyl interaction, are also investigated. Analyzing the structural orientations of the pi...pi stacking interactions, we find that herringbone shape is a major configuration in transient protein-protein interfaces. This result is different from that of protein core, where parallel-displaced configurations are the major configuration. We also analyze overall trend of amide-carbonyl and hydroxyl-carbonyl interactions. It is noticeable that nearly 82% of the interfaces have at least one hydroxyl-carbonyl interactions.
(c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Molecular determinants for ATP-binding in proteins: a data mining and quantum chemical analysis.J Mol Biol. 2004 Feb 20;336(3):787-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.056. J Mol Biol. 2004. PMID: 15095988
-
Physicochemical descriptors to discriminate protein-protein interactions in permanent and transient complexes selected by means of machine learning algorithms.Proteins. 2006 Nov 15;65(3):607-22. doi: 10.1002/prot.21104. Proteins. 2006. PMID: 16955490
-
The many faces of protein-protein interactions: A compendium of interface geometry.PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Sep 29;2(9):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020124. Epub 2006 Jul 31. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006. PMID: 17009862 Free PMC article.
-
Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure.Q Rev Biophys. 2008 May;41(2):133-80. doi: 10.1017/S0033583508004708. Q Rev Biophys. 2008. PMID: 18812015 Review.
-
Phage display for engineering and analyzing protein interaction interfaces.Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007 Aug;17(4):481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Sep 17. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007. PMID: 17870470 Review.
Cited by
-
BD SIMULATIONS OF THE IONIC STRENGTH DEPENDENCE OF THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TRIOSE PHOSPHATE ISOMERASE AND F-ACTIN.J Undergrad Chem Res. 2010 Fall;9(4):87-96. J Undergrad Chem Res. 2010. PMID: 24639622 Free PMC article.
-
A novel method for protein-protein interaction site prediction using phylogenetic substitution models.Proteins. 2012 Jan;80(1):126-41. doi: 10.1002/prot.23169. Epub 2011 Oct 12. Proteins. 2012. PMID: 21989996 Free PMC article.
-
A feature-based approach to modeling protein-protein interaction hot spots.Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 May;37(8):2672-87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp132. Epub 2009 Mar 9. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009. PMID: 19273533 Free PMC article.
-
Affinity- and specificity-enhancing mutations are frequent in multispecific interactions between TIMP2 and MMPs.PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e93712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093712. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24710006 Free PMC article.
-
Knitting and untying the protein network: modulation of protein ensembles as a therapeutic strategy.Protein Sci. 2009 Mar;18(3):481-93. doi: 10.1002/pro.43. Protein Sci. 2009. PMID: 19241367 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous