Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec 1;91(11):4285-95.
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.075366. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles

Affiliations

Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles

Claus-Dieter Ohl et al. Biophys J. .

Abstract

The fluid dynamic interaction of cavitation bubbles with adherent cells on a substrate is experimentally investigated. We find that the nonspherical collapse of bubbles near to the boundary is responsible for cell detachment. High-speed photography reveals that a wall bounded flow leads to the detachment of cells. Cells at the edge of the circular area of detachment are found to be permanently porated, whereas cells at some distance from the detachment area undergo viable cell membrane poration (sonoporation). The wall flow field leading to cell detachment is modeled with a self-similar solution for a wall jet, together with a kinetic ansatz of adhesive bond rupture. The self-similar solution for the delta-type wall jet compares very well with the full solution of the Navier-Stokes equation for a jet of finite thickness. Apart from annular sites of sonoporation we also find more homogenous patterns of molecule delivery with no cell detachment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sketch of the experimental setup. Shock waves in the water basin are generated with a piezoelectric transducer and are focused under an angle of 45° to the horizontal. The adhering HeLa cells on the petri dish are facing the shock-wave generator and are illuminated with a light guide. Imaging of the cell layer is done with a long-working-distance microscope connected to the high-speed framing system Brandaris 128.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(a) Sketch of the side view and top view of the bubble cluster. The incoming wave enters under an angle of 45°. Two bubble clusters are generated; one from the main wave, and a smaller one from the reflection at the inner surface of the petri dish. The side view (right) depicts areas A and C where bubble-collapse onto the adherent cells takes place. Area B is largely free of bubbles. (b) Large-scale fluorescence microscope picture of the substrate after the bubble collapse. Annular structures of molecular uptake (bright cells) are found in regions A and C, where region B is covered with a diffuse pattern. The white bar denotes a scale of 10 mm.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Closeup of typical cell detachment areas found in region A of Fig. 2. Viable porated cells are colored green (calcein uptake) and red cells are stained with ethidium bromide (permanent poration). The left image depicts the detachment and sonoporation from a single bubble, and the right image depicts two bubbles that have collapsed close to each other. The bar denotes 0.5 mm.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Closeup of typical cell detachment areas found in region B of Fig. 2. Viable porated cells are colored green (calcein uptake) and red cells are stained with ethidium bromide (permanent poration). Approximately 15% of the cells are permanently porated. The bar denotes 0.5 mm.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Three scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs with increasing magnification from left to right. The white bar denotes a length of 20 μm. (a) Overview of a disk-shaped detachment site. (b) Magnified view of the grayed area in a showing rounded and piled-up cells at the border and flat cells further away. (c) The rounded cells at the border reveal structural damage on their membrane indicated with white arrows.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Detachment dynamics caused by the collapse of a single bubble close to a layer of adherent cells (shaded background). Here, selected frames from a framing sequence taken at 230,000 frames per second are depicted. The solid bar in the last frame denotes a scale of 1 mm. The numbers in the upper right of the frames indicate the elapsed time in microseconds after the start of the negative pressure. The bubble reaches maximum size at ∼t = 80 μs and shrinks to its smallest size at t = 154 μs. Then it reexpands as a corrugated toroidal bubble. From time t = 180 μs, the rim of the detached area becomes visible. The area continuous to expand even after the bubble has disintegrated.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Radius of the bubble (□) and the size of the detached area (○) as a function of time. Zero time denotes the instant when the negative pressure wave reaches the cells.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Streamlines for the similarity solution from Glauert of the wall jet for different values of the Re-number. The jet is flowing along the line x = 0 and impinging at the origin.
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Sketch of the geometry to solve the Navier-Stokes equation in axisymmetry. The jet with a diameter of djet is released at a distance of hjet from the rigid wall.
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
Streamlines for the full Navier-Stokes solution of the wall jet. The solid rectangle indicates the position of the incoming jet.
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 11
Profiles of the horizontal flow velocity for the full solution (solid lines) and the self-similar solution (dashed lines). For larger distances Rjet from the origin, both models show good agreement.
FIGURE 12
FIGURE 12
The wall shear stress as a function of the distance for the full solution (solid lines) and the self-similar Glauert solution. For distances larger than ∼3 Rjet from the origin, good agreement is obtained.
FIGURE 13
FIGURE 13
Radius of the detachment area xc as a function of the maximum bubble radius Rmax obtained from the numerical solution of Eq. 8 for τc (solid line) and through the approximation Eq. 10 (dotted line). The solid squares denote measurements.

References

    1. Miller, M. W., D. L. Miller, and A. A. Brayman. 1996. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 22:1131–1154. - PubMed
    1. Ng, K., and Y. Liu. 2002. Therapeutic ultrasound: its application in drug delivery. Med. Res. Rev. 22:204–223. - PubMed
    1. Bao, S. P., B. D. Thrall, and D. L. Miller. 1997. Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 23:953–959. - PubMed
    1. Ward, M., J. R. Wu, and J. F. Chiu. 1999. Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:2951–2957. - PubMed
    1. Stride, E., and N. Saffari. 2003. Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 217:429–447. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources