Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer
- PMID: 16954471
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj329
Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer
Abstract
Background: A 70-gene signature was previously shown to have prognostic value in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Our goal was to validate the signature in an independent group of patients.
Methods: Patients (n = 307, with 137 events after a median follow-up of 13.6 years) from five European centers were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the gene signature classification and on clinical risk classifications. Patients were assigned to the gene signature low-risk group if their 5-year distant metastasis-free survival probability as estimated by the gene signature was greater than 90%. Patients were assigned to the clinicopathologic low-risk group if their 10-year survival probability, as estimated by Adjuvant! software, was greater than 88% (for estrogen receptor [ER]-positive patients) or 92% (for ER-negative patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated to compare time to distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival in high- versus low-risk groups.
Results: The 70-gene signature outperformed the clinicopathologic risk assessment in predicting all endpoints. For time to distant metastases, the gene signature yielded HR = 2.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35 to 4.00) without adjustment for clinical risk and hazard ratios ranging from 2.13 to 2.15 after adjustment for various estimates of clinical risk; clinicopathologic risk using Adjuvant! software yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.68 (95% CI = 0.92 to 3.07). For overall survival, the gene signature yielded an unadjusted HR = 2.79 (95% CI = 1.60 to 4.87) and adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 2.63 to 2.89; clinicopathologic risk yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.67 (95% CI = 0.93 to 2.98). For patients in the gene signature high-risk group, 10-year overall survival was 0.69 for patients in both the low- and high-clinical risk groups; for patients in the gene signature low-risk group, the 10-year survival rates were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively.
Conclusions: The 70-gene signature adds independent prognostic information to clinicopathologic risk assessment for patients with early breast cancer.
Comment in
-
Development and evaluation of therapeutically relevant predictive classifiers using gene expression profiling.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Sep 6;98(17):1169-71. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj364. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16954463 No abstract available.
-
Can a 70-gene signature provide useful prognostic information in patients with node-negative breast cancer?Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007 Apr;4(4):216-7. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0747. Epub 2007 Feb 6. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17290242 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk estimation of distant metastasis in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients using an RT-PCR based prognostic expression signature.BMC Cancer. 2008 Nov 21;8:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-339. BMC Cancer. 2008. PMID: 19025599 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Oct;117(3):483-95. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0191-2. Epub 2008 Sep 26. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009. PMID: 18819002
-
Development and validation of a gene expression-based signature to predict distant metastasis in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):382-393. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 7. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29428165
-
The prognostic value of long noncoding RNA HOTTIP on clinical outcomes in breast cancer.Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 24;8(4):6833-6844. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14304. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28036281 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gene expression profile assays as predictors of distant recurrence-free survival in early-stage breast cancer.Cancer Invest. 2009 Nov;27(9):885-90. doi: 10.3109/07357900903275142. Cancer Invest. 2009. PMID: 19832034 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Breast cancer classification and prognostication through diverse systems along with recent emerging findings in this respect; the dawn of new perspectives in the clinical applications.Tumour Biol. 2016 Nov;37(11):14479-14499. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5349-7. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Tumour Biol. 2016. PMID: 27651157 Review.
-
Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 6;9(1):48-57. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.178. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 22143140 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular Biology in the Breast Clinics-Current status and future perspectives.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):7-20. doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00954-1. Epub 2019 Aug 10. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33994723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A triple hormone receptor ER, AR, and VDR signature is a robust prognosis predictor in breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 13;26(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01876-9. Breast Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 39272208 Free PMC article.
-
Genome-scale mechanistic modeling of signaling pathways made easy: A bioconductor/cytoscape/web server framework for the analysis of omic data.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 May 15;19:2968-2978. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.022. eCollection 2021. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021. PMID: 34136096 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical