Patch testing: pitfalls and performance
- PMID: 16954787
- DOI: 10.1097/01.all.0000244794.03239.8e
Patch testing: pitfalls and performance
Abstract
Purpose of review: Contact dermatitis is a common disease process that includes allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, is patch testing. Patch testing is not a difficult procedure, however, there are several critical components that determine the success of the test: having an appropriate level of suspicion for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, an adequate threshold for patch testing, the necessary experience to properly interpret the results and to determine their relevance, and the ability to thoroughly educate the patient about the condition.
Recent findings: Research shows that patch testing practices differ among individuals and specialties. The level of patch testing education, interest in, and experience with, the procedure can affect the results of the test. Some of these practice differences and how they affect the outcome of patch testing are highlighted.
Summary: Physicians' knowledge and experience with patch testing, their level of interest and access to allergens will determine the performance of this test, the reliability of the results and the benefits gained from this procedure.
Similar articles
-
Dispelling the myths behind pediatric patch testing-experience from our tertiary care patch testing centers.Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):296-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00670.x. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18577031
-
[Epicutaneous testing (patch testing)].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Apr 30;113(11):1361-2. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993. PMID: 8337626 Norwegian.
-
Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Oct;37(10):1541-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02805.x. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007. PMID: 17883733
-
Contact dermatitis.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Feb;78(2):160-73; quiz 174-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63383-2. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997. PMID: 9048524 Review.
-
Patch testing: after 100 years, still the gold standard in diagnosing cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity.Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M. 1997;(91):195-202. Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M. 1997. PMID: 9383910 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Early immune events in the induction of allergic contact dermatitis.Nat Rev Immunol. 2012 Jan 13;12(2):114-24. doi: 10.1038/nri3150. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012. PMID: 22240625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unmet diagnostic needs in contact oral mucosal allergies.Clin Mol Allergy. 2016 Sep 1;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12948-016-0047-y. eCollection 2016. Clin Mol Allergy. 2016. PMID: 27587983 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The pathogenic role of innate lymphoid cells in autoimmune-related and inflammatory skin diseases.Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Apr;17(4):335-346. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0399-6. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020. PMID: 32203190 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-heat inactivated autologous serum increases accuracy of in vitro CFSE lymphocyte proliferation test (LPT) for nickel.Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Jun;50(6):722-732. doi: 10.1111/cea.13603. Epub 2020 Apr 14. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020. PMID: 32215995 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nickel allergy is associated with a broad spectrum cytokine response.Contact Dermatitis. 2023 Jan;88(1):10-17. doi: 10.1111/cod.14199. Epub 2022 Sep 8. Contact Dermatitis. 2023. PMID: 36082421 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials