[Is there any point in detecting high risk factors prior to a first psychosis?]
- PMID: 16956006
[Is there any point in detecting high risk factors prior to a first psychosis?]
Abstract
Background: If schizophrenia and related disorders are diagnosed and treated early, symptoms will be less severe and the prognosis will be more favourable. There is little point in screening for schizophrenia in the general population because the illness has such a low incidence. However, we do need to find out whether it is meaningful to screen genetically impaired individuals (high risk group) and specific groups of psychiatric patients (ultra high risk group).
Aim: To survey the research into the (high and ultra high) risk factors for developing a first psychosis and to find out whether it makes good sense to screen certain groups of persons.
Method: We conducted extensive desk-research and a wide-ranging search of the literature from 1990 to 2004. The key words we used in our search were 'prodrome', 'high risk', 'ultra high risk', in conjunction with 'psychosis' and 'schizophrenia'.
Results: In the genetically impaired group risk factors for developing schizophrenia seem to be transient psychiatric problems in childhood, schizotypical traits, anxiety, behavioural problems in adolescence, being brought up in an unstable environment and producing deviant results in neurocognitive tests. Among the patients referred to a psychiatrist it is possible to identify a special group of patients with an ultra high risk of developing a psychosis. Within ayear 40% of patients who had mild or short-term psychotic symptoms or who were genetically impaired adolescents with decreased functioning had developed a psychosis.
Conclusion: Screening all genetically vulnerable persons in the general population has no consequencesfor treatment. Early diagnosis by psychiatrists is certainly advisable. However, larger groups and longer studies are needed in order to demonstrate conclusively the preventive effect of interventions prior to a first psychosis.
Similar articles
-
Early detection and intervention of psychosis. A review.Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(2):92-105. doi: 10.1080/08039480801984008. Nord J Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18569772 Review.
-
[Pre-psychotic states--contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic issues. Part I. Clinical identification of pre-psychotic states].Psychiatr Pol. 2007 Jan-Feb;41(1):5-15. Psychiatr Pol. 2007. PMID: 17494410 Review. Polish.
-
Familial predisposition for psychiatric disorder: comparison of subjects treated for cannabis-induced psychosis and schizophrenia.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;65(11):1269-74. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.11.1269. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18981338
-
Negative performance beliefs and negative symptoms in individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis: a preliminary study.Psychopathology. 2009;42(6):375-9. doi: 10.1159/000236909. Epub 2009 Sep 15. Psychopathology. 2009. PMID: 19752591
-
[The Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis (BSIP): development, structure, reliability and validity].Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2008 Apr;76(4):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038155. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2008. PMID: 18393134 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical