Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Sep 30;333(7570):682.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38924.722037.7C. Epub 2006 Sep 6.

Experiences of belittlement and harassment and their correlates among medical students in the United States: longitudinal survey

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Experiences of belittlement and harassment and their correlates among medical students in the United States: longitudinal survey

Erica Frank et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine medical students' perceptions of having been harassed or belittled and their correlates, for the purposes of reducing such abuses.

Design: Longitudinal survey.

Setting: 16 nationally representative US medical schools.

Participants: 2884 students from class of 2003.

Main outcome measures: Experiences of harassment and belittlement at freshman orientation, at entry to wards, and in senior year by other students, by residents or fellows, by preclinical professors, by clinical professors or attendings, or by patients.

Results: 2316 students provided data (response rate 80.3%). Among seniors, 42% (581/1387) reported having experienced harassment and 84% (1166/1393) belittlement during medical school. These types of abuse were caused by other students (11% (158/1389) and 32% (443/1390) of students experienced such harassment or belittlement, respectively). Harassment and belittlement was also caused by residents (27% (374/1387) and 71% (993/1393)), preclinical professors (9% (131/1386) and 29% (398/1385)), clinical professors (21% (285/1386) and 63% (878/1390)), and patients (25% (352/1387) and 43% (592/1388)). Only 13% (181/1385) of students classified any of these experiences as severe. Medical students who reported having been harassed or belittled did not differ significantly from those not reporting such experiences by sex, ethnicity, political orientation, or religion. They did differ significantly by chosen specialty and were significantly more likely to be stressed, depressed, and suicidal, to drink alcohol or to binge drink, and to state that their faculty did not care about medical students. They were also significantly less likely to be glad they trained to become a doctor.

Conclusion: Most medical students in the United States report having been harassed or belittled during their training. Although few students characterised the harassment or belittlement as severe, poor mental health and low career satisfaction were significantly correlated with these experiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of medical students experiencing harassment or belittlement at entry to wards or in senior year

Comment in

References

    1. American Association of Medical Colleges. Matriculant age at anticipated matriculation, 1992-2001. AAMC data warehouse: applicant matriculant file. www.aamc.org/data/facts/archive/famg112001a.htm (accessed 20 Jan 2006).
    1. American Association of Medical Colleges. FACTS—applicants, matriculants, and graduates—new entrants by gender and race/ethnicity. www.aamc.org/data/facts/archive/famg52001a.htm (accessed 20 Jan 2006).
    1. American Association of Medical Colleges. AAMC data warehouse: student records system as of December 12, 2000, reflecting those actively enrolled on October 31, 2000. www.aamc.org/data/facts/archive/famg82001.htm (accessed 20 Jan 2006).
    1. National Institutes of Health. Support to US medical schools, fiscal year 2000. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/award/rank/medschrank00.txt (accessed 20 Jan 2006).
    1. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys. the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000.

Publication types