Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006;5(1):4-9.
doi: 10.1385/ncc:5:1:4.

Effect of a liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategy on mortality in patients with moderate to severe head injury

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategy on mortality in patients with moderate to severe head injury

Lauralyn A McIntyre et al. Neurocrit Care. 2006.

Abstract

Objective: To compare a restrictive versus a liberal transfusion strategy in patients with moderate to severe closed head injury following multiple trauma in 13 Canadian intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods: This is a subgroup analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial involving sixty-seven critically ill patients from the Transfusion Requirements in the Critical Care trial who sustained a closed head injury. Patients had a hemoglobin concentration less than 9.0 g/dL within 72 hours of admission to the ICU. Patients were randomized to a restrictive allogeneic red blood cell transfusion strategy (hemoglobin 7.0 g/dL and maintained between 7.0 and 9.0 g/dL) or a liberal strategy (hemoglobin 10.0 g/dL and maintained between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL).

Results: Baseline characteristics in the restrictive ( n = 29) and the liberal ( n = 38) transfusion groups were comparable. Average hemoglobin concentrations and red blood cell units transfused per patient were significantly lower in the restrictive compared to the liberal group. The 30-day all-cause mortality rates in the restrictive group were 17% as compared to 13% in the liberal group (risk difference 4.1 with 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.4 to 21.5, p = 0.64). Presence of multiple organ dysfunction (12.1 +/- 6.4 versus 10.6 +/- 6.3, p = 0.35) and changes in multiple organ dysfunction from baseline scores adjusted for death (4.5 +/- 6.2 versus 3.4 +/- 6.2, p = 0.49) were similar between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups, respectively. Median length of stay in ICU (10 days, interquartile range 5 to 21 days versus 8 days, interquartile range 5 to 11 days, p = 0.26) and hospital (27 days, interquartile range 14 to 39 days versus 30.5 days, interquartile range 17 to 47 days, p = 0.72) were similar between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups.

Conclusions: We were unable to detect significant improvements in mortality with a liberal as compared to restrictive transfusion strategy in critically ill trauma victims with moderate to severe head injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1997 Jun;132(6):620-4; discussion 624-5 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Feb;33(2):333-8 - PubMed
    1. Transfus Med Rev. 2002 Jul;16(3):187-99 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pract. 1956 Nov;10(11):770-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Neurosurg. 1993;7(3):267-79 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources