Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006;26(3):372-3, 377.
doi: 10.1007/BF02829580.

Measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK by dynamic contour tonometry

Affiliations

Measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK by dynamic contour tonometry

Lei Liu et al. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2006.

Abstract

Changes of corneal properties induced by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) results in low inaccurate intraocular pressure (IOP) readings by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Before and after LASIK, the applied value of IOP, measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in comparison to GAT, was evaluated. Before and 1, 4 weeks after LASIK, the IOP in 30 cases (60 eyes) was measured by GAT and DCT respectively. The obtained results were statistically processed by SPSS11.5 statistical software. The results showed that central corneal thickness (CCT) could affect GAT measurements but not DCT measurements. The comparison of IOP one and 4 weeks after LASIK revealed that the readings from GAT was separately decreased by 5.00 +/- 1.12 and 5.45 +/- 1.13 mmHg as compared with those before LASIK, while those from DCT had no significant difference. It was concluded that LASIK-induced changes of CCT could influence the accuracy of GAT measurements, but had no influence on those from DCT. DCT was more beneficial to the measurements of IOP in normal eyes and those subject to LASIK surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. J Refract Surg. 1995 Sep-Oct;11(5):366-70 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1997 Jun;104(6):945-8; discussion 949 - PubMed
    1. Can J Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;33(3):159-65 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 May 15;115(5):592-6 - PubMed
    1. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993 Jul-Aug;38(1):1-30 - PubMed